A FB 33 suggestion in the Shakespeare funerary plaque

[RoyalCraftiness]

There are six lines of text in the bottom of this plaque that are written in English.

One can divide the 6 lines in 2 halves (top and bottom). The first line has a suspicious 33 letters in it. Each half has 110 letters for a total of 220. The number 220 is relatable to the period of the Great Trigon. It is also a 4x55 suggestion.

With these oddities in mind I considered the letter frequencies in this 220 letter arrangement as it would appear to be a possible "holder" of information. What has come out of that is the observation that two letters, F and B are the only ones with a frequency of 3. That caught my attention as potentially "signaling". I've tagged each above. Visually these appear to be on the periphery. They allow for a closed irregular polygon to be constructed.

The logical question I was faced with is how could any shape like this be informing us of anything if it was the carrier of empiric information. There are 6 points and no obvious way to identify a center or common point of relation to all points. I decided to look into this to see how one would go about this today. The question I am asking can be reframed by asking "what is the centroid of this irregular polygon". The question most definitely has an answer using Cartesian coordinates. However, this was not available to Tudor minds yet. The task does have a geometric equivalent. There is a trick, known to the Greeks for small polygons, that involves translation of points by way of repeated recalculating of arithmetic means between apex points. By doing so one can convert any number of points forming an irregular polygon into an equivalent regular polygon which easily has its center found by simply finding the arithmetic mean of its symmetrical apexes which will meet at the center.

Is the method easy? Easy as pie. Is there evidence it was used? Yes, and quite a lot for triangles up to pentagons if you go back to ancient sources. The interesting thing is that the demonstration of this was lost and only rediscovered in much more recent times by a Czech mathematician named Petr. Since then it has affectionately been called Petr's miracle.

I will not describe the "miracle", but you should certainly watch this video about it. 

PETR'S MIRACLE: Why was it lost for 100 years? (Mathologer Masterclass) (youtube.com)

The application of the method allows us to transform our 6 irregularly placed points in 4 steps. Each step will modify the polygon and translate it ever closer towards a regular equivalent.

That looks like this in this case:

The end result in in blue. What is paramount here is that one realizes that all the steps produce shapes that are equal in that they have the same centroid. By getting to the regular shape in 4 steps one gains the ability to easily determine its position without Cartesian coordinates. Just draw segments from the opposing apexes of the blue hexagon to get the center.

Are we any richer for doing this? Yes, in fact we discover something quite unexpected. The centroid of the FB points is the same as the center of the rectangular frame of the plaque. That center is the apex of the A in SH(A)KSPEARE. How likely is his to have happened by chance? It did not. For anyone who would want to verify this I have the geogebra file to share which allows the dynamic shifting of these points in order to visualize what happens to the centroid. It moves according to one's choices of letter positions. Since the point of the A is quite specific as a pointer you easily move from it.

That's great on one level, but it really only leads us to the next question which is why signal the apex of the A? To answer that question one has to have already worked out that the SHA here is contained within the Vesica that is given by the four circle geometry in that plaque.

That Vesica is involving the H of the SHA through it's median. This has a definite feeling of a two center solution. I suspect that the two center solution resides in the fact that SHA is the S(olomon)-H(iram) A(biff) pair. These are the two KINGS (Hiram of Tyre and Solomon) who came together and allowed for THE TEMPLE to be constructed in the Hebrew Story recalled in the Bible. 

As I have quoted elsewhere from Hamlet:

"If Circumstances leade me,

I will finde Where truth is hid,

though it were hid indeede Within the Center"

The truth in the center here is contained in the Vesica at the center of the four circle arrangement AND in the centroid of the FB 33 solution. It is a Masonic riddle, in a sense. As great as the Temple was it was made by the cooperation of men who had different ideas of God. One had Baal as a God and one had Jahweh (almost opposites). In the more modern Masonic tradition On was included (Sun God). For a Freemason, the creator concept can be encapsulated by the word JahBalOn which has a few variations. It is a creative force that has at least those three in it. The Holy Royal Arch tradition used O,O,O as a symbol of it. Other symbolism was used. The eyes of the owl O,O have been used for two of the aspects. 0 to Dee was T, so we get an Enochian TTT out of three 0s. I like Herge's treatment of it as the contribution of the three masts (tees) become one in the light and show us the way to the treasure of the lost inheritance.

It is difficult to ascribe an author to this plaque without involving early Freemasons who appear to be signaling something with FB 33.

SHA has an empirical component. It is 18-8-1 which points us to the 18,81,81 isosceles triangle. It was used likely as a cue to Dee's reference rhumb with its Beta spiral angle of 72 degrees. (90-72=18 degrees that is referenced from a latitude line like the equator like I often do). In all this is recalled the perfection of ten and the divine proportion of Phi in the plan. With careful consideration one can work back to Dee's invention of the paradoxal compass (a beam compass) and see how legitimate scientific inquiry was trying to align itself with Biblical stories for the benefit of one unifying presentation. 

With this in mind it has been possible to look back at some of the things I have considered and notice how cleverly a "SHA" line is placed in the text in the visuals which completely went unnoticed. On the "eternity line" demo that Rob made elsewhere. The SHA line is right there forming an angle with it. Both the SHA lien and the eternity spiral lead to N(north). 

You can it here starting with the S of Sonnets:

It forms the 40,60,80 triangle which houses the Cross in Cygnus, and true to form involves the Apex of the A and goes through two points. Above it I highlighted SWAN which is fact the constellation associated with the 60 degree corner of the 40,60,80 triangular asterism in the sky in zenith above the Mahone Bay point.  The SHA line was given here with a 60 degree angle from horizontal. That 60 is always a hexagonal geometry cue. It's no coincidence that we were given 6 FB points, I would argue. The odd thing for me is: was Bacon given the 6 cents denomination on the Newfoundland stamp because Freemasons "lobbied" for that? Could very well be. There were a number of denominations in that series of stamps to select from. Freemasons in these parts were once more common than swans are in London.

 

 

 

Edited July 20, 2024 by RoyalCraftiness

[Light-of-Truth]

8 hours ago, RoyalCraftiness said:

What has come out of that is the observation that two letters, F and B are the only ones with a frequency of 3. That caught my attention as potentially "signaling". I've tagged each above. Visually these appear to be on the periphery. They allow for a closed irregular polygon to be constructed.

The letters  F and B appear three times in this carved plaque for Shakespeare. F and B once each in the first line with 33 characters.

The second part of that line between commas adds up nice.

WHY GOEST THOV BY SO FAST is 277 Simple cipher the same as FRANCIS BACON WILLIAM SHAKESPEARE.

3 X FB, I love it and can even think of ways to look Deeper.

That's pretty cool by itself CJ! I don't recall seeing it before you mentioned it. Is it your discovery? Or if that word carries too much baggage, are you the first to notice and mention it?

What a fun tidbit! 🙂

And so much more to explore!

[Light-of-Truth]

10 hours ago, RoyalCraftiness said:

I will not describe the "miracle", but you should certainly watch this video about it. 

PETR'S MIRACLE: Why was it lost for 100 years? (Mathologer Masterclass) (youtube.com)

The application of the method allows us to transform our 6 irregularly placed points in 4 steps. Each step will modify the polygon and translate it ever closer towards a regular equivalent.

I'd call it a miracle as well! And obviously scalable with any polygon ultimately ending up as an infinite point. Great video.

Yet here we have another Infinite portal into Eternity...

<--1881-->

Using that miracle formula which is easy to follow, the "A" of "SHAKESPEARE" is center of the irregular polygon starting the six points of F's and B's.

10 hours ago, RoyalCraftiness said:

SHA has an empirical component. It is 18-8-1 which points us to the 18,81,81 isosceles triangle. It was used likely as a cue to Dee's reference rhumb with its Beta spiral angle of 72 degrees. (90-72=18 degrees that is referenced from a latitude line like the equator like I often do). In all this is recalled the perfection of ten and the divine proportion of Phi in the plan. With careful consideration one can work back to Dee's invention of the paradoxal compass (a beam compass) and see how legitimate scientific inquiry was trying to align itself with Biblical stories for the benefit of one unifying presentation. 

I need to catch my breath, my Bacon/Dee brain is like a thousand point irregular polygon just beginning to add a few ears! LOL

Truth is, eventually I know there is an infinite point that will be an inevitable result of some simple math. 😉

And this is in full public view in the Shakespeare funerary plaque. Not that anybody but eccentric math people who enjoy Sacred Geometry will ever understand. Lol

I suppose one day Oxfordians might claim the three times F and B refer to Edward de Vere by some creative and deceptive twist. The Strats would have a really hard time I think. As a Baconian I am excited as I am seeing an old secret revealed!

Yes, please send me the GeoGebra file. 🙂

Still more to digest!!

[RoyalCraftiness]

20 hours ago, Light-of-Truth said:

I'd call it a miracle as well! And obviously scalable with any polygon ultimately ending up as an infinite point. Great video.

Yet here we have another Infinite portal into Eternity...

<--1881-->

Using that miracle formula which is easy to follow, the "A" of "SHAKESPEARE" is center of the irregular polygon starting the six points of F's and B's.

I need to catch my breath, my Bacon/Dee brain is like a thousand point irregular polygon just beginning to add a few ears! LOL

Truth is, eventually I know there is an infinite point that will be an inevitable result of some simple math. 😉

And this is in full public view in the Shakespeare funerary plaque. Not that anybody but eccentric math people who enjoy Sacred Geometry will ever understand. Lol

I suppose one day Oxfordians might claim the three times F and B refer to Edward de Vere by some creative and deceptive twist. The Strats would have a really hard time I think. As a Baconian I am excited as I am seeing an old secret revealed!

Yes, please send me the GeoGebra file. 🙂

Still more to digest!!

I think it like a serious "glitch in the Matrix", so to speak, lol. It's so elegant it kinds blows one away at first. I only had a vague recollection of how to find a centroid in an irregular shape, and it wasn't this way. With Geogebra you can certainly have fun with it by dropping random points and transforming them into their corresponding regular polygons. The point is not to have done it to impress us, though. I would appear it was done to call attention to that A again.

I kid you not, but the more you play with this the more you will start to see how straightforward this is to do. You' ll get an intuitive sense of why it works after a while. Reading the Wiki on centroids is illuminating too.  Someone had to first notice this spatial conformality, and it's not a surprise to me that it was the Greeks as they were all over polygonal geometry. It makes you wonder what else was in Archimedes' books that are lost to us. Doing it with a triangle is something you can get a 6th grader to do. I'm pretty sure you can easily make them understand that averages are things that can be represented with geometry.

The frequency of the letters F and B just came out of the larger look I had at that English text.  Once I noticed that there were 33 letters on the first line and a 3 line symmetry of 110 in the 6 I strongly suspected that there was something else hiding deeper in the bushes. If you ask enough of the right questions (the type that can be answered) once and a while some get spectacularly answered and they lead to the next round of questions. There is also the ordinal positions of these 6 letters which I have said noting about. I'm, still considering that. 

I'm now highly suspicious that these six points have a geographic counterpart, because a centroid probably only ever mattered to someone as a way to find a geographic center on a map.

Imagine a polygon made of all the points corresponding to the visible stars in the sky and ask yourself if someone didn't come to the conclusion that the centroid was at the North Star position. They would almost have to make that sort of equivalence seeing how special that point would have appeared to them (everything turning about it as if it was perfectly placed somehow in balance with everything else). That gets one thinking of the precession cycle and fact that that there are 5 of these North star positions that we keep revisiting.  The next one will be in Cygnus. This 5 is again a call to the pentagonal geometry and the angle of 72 degrees.  It's likely because of 72 that its complimentary angle 18 makes an appearance.

Everything I have presented are my personal observations, I don't present other people's ideas as mine. I will sometime consider people's observations if I feel they are have not been followed to a fitting end. In this case I just counted, was taken by that peculiarity and asked what else it could possibly lead to.

 

 

Edited July 21, 2024 by RoyalCraftiness

[Light-of-Truth]

1 hour ago, RoyalCraftiness said:

I think like a serious "glitch in the Matrix", so to speak, lol. It's so elegant it kinds blows one away at first. I only had a vague recollection of how to find a centroid in an irregular shape, and it wasn't this way. With Geogebra you can certainly have fun with it by dropping random points and transforming them into their corresponding regular polygons. The point is not to have done it to impress us, though. I would appear it was done to call attention to that A again.

It is still blowing me away!

Let me see if I got it right?

One can take any number of random points and follow a fairly simple formula, and in some steps will go from an irregular polygon and end up with a perfect one. That means all the sides and all the angles are the same and there will be a perfectly defined central point. By the nature of the formula, the very next step turns the entire process inward and into that infinite point. Everything becomes that point.

I've had two visionary experiences in my life when the entire Universe in a brightly colored vibrating geometric chaos eventually unfolded into itself, and with me along for the ride, reduced down to a perfect single point. I'm not talking about a hundred random points or so, I am talking about the entire Universe!

I was amazed how something so infinitely large as our Universe could seem to spiral into and become a single point.

Coming out the other side of the point was always invigorating! Whew!

 

 

 

[RoyalCraftiness]

40 minutes ago, Light-of-Truth said:

It is still blowing me away!

Let me see if I got it right?

One can take any number of random points and follow a fairly simple formula, and in some steps will go from an irregular polygon and end up with a perfect one. That means all the sides and all the angles are the same and there will be a perfectly defined central point. By the nature of the formula, the very next step turns the entire process inward and into that infinite point. Everything becomes that point.

I've had two visionary experiences in my life when the entire Universe in a brightly colored vibrating geometric chaos eventually unfolded into itself, and with me along for the ride, reduced down to a perfect single point. I'm not talking about a hundred random points or so, I am talking about the entire Universe!

I was amazed how something so infinitely large as our Universe could seem to spiral into and become a single point.

Coming out the other side of the point was always invigorating! Whew!

 

 

 

N-2 steps, N being the number of points. You will get the regular N-gon from the translation which will be placed in space in such a way that it will conserve the centroid position

 

[RoyalCraftiness]

On 7/20/2024 at 4:59 PM, Light-of-Truth said:

The letters  F and B appear three times in this carved plaque for Shakespeare. F and B once each in the first line with 33 characters.

The second part of that line between commas adds up nice.

WHY GOEST THOV BY SO FAST is 277 Simple cipher the same as FRANCIS BACON WILLIAM SHAKESPEARE.

3 X FB, I love it and can even think of ways to look Deeper.

That's pretty cool by itself CJ! I don't recall seeing it before you mentioned it. Is it your discovery? Or if that word carries too much baggage, are you the first to notice and mention it?

What a fun tidbit! 🙂

And so much more to explore!

I'm certainly not done exploring this.

The relationship of those six points, being not arbitrary, will likely serve the "paradoxal compass" navigational idea, imo. 

Look what I noticed about these points.

You can use all point to define a circle (EFD definin an arc), G allows a line through E that intersects a line from H through D at point I which shows a 90 degree angle. This makes line GC intersect a parallel of GE going at FL. That intersecting point is the Apex of the A again. By doing this we define a 90,50,40 triangle IGH. This appear too regular and involving of A to be uninteresting.

The circle bisects the word TERRA in two letter halves. I also like that it bisects GENIO, lol. Are we looking at a globe suggestion? "Terra Tegit" is a TT suggestion that translates to" Earth Covers". Does it cover some truth as some have alleged this line in the plaque might be written to suggest: The Earth covers (a truth), the people are bereaved (of the truth) and Olympus knows (the truth). The third letter of Olympus is intersected. The "Y" is a steganographic triangle/trinity suggestion. Is the center of this circle the North pole of a flat stereographic projection of the sort is suggested in Sylva Sylvarum? What of that A apex then? What would it give? Lots to look at.

Edited July 24, 2024 by RoyalCraftiness

[RoyalCraftiness]

On 7/20/2024 at 4:59 PM, Light-of-Truth said:

The letters  F and B appear three times in this carved plaque for Shakespeare. F and B once each in the first line with 33 characters.

The second part of that line between commas adds up nice.

WHY GOEST THOV BY SO FAST is 277 Simple cipher the same as FRANCIS BACON WILLIAM SHAKESPEARE.

3 X FB, I love it and can even think of ways to look Deeper.

That's pretty cool by itself CJ! I don't recall seeing it before you mentioned it. Is it your discovery? Or if that word carries too much baggage, are you the first to notice and mention it?

What a fun tidbit! 🙂

And so much more to explore!

3 x 62 is 186. Don't you have a thing for that number? It's a July 5th suggestion isn't it? On July 5th 1610, John Guy's expedition of 40 colonists left England to colonize Newfoundland. 

He got the 3 cents denomination in the stamp series that has Bacon on the 6 cents. Guy settled at Cuper's Cove colony on behalf of the Society of Merchant Venturers as a result of the work of the expeditions of Gilbert (whom Dee had trained in Geometry prior to his expeditions) to claim the land for Elizabeth I in previous voyages.  The place is called Cupids, Newfoundland, today.

On day 186 in 1776, July 4th, (it was a leap year) the 13 colonies declared their independence from England.

In Freemasonry, this day has the peculiar, but understandable reputation of being the 4th day of the 27th week. 4x27 is by definition the perfect ashlar's perimeter (108).

We should notice that Guy being 3 and Bacon 6 has some potential for recognition. Together that is 36 and 36x3 is 108.  3x6=18, and that is relevant to Dee's "art of perfect navigation" scheme due to the 18 being the compliment of the 72 degrees which is the constant heading of this standard rhumb line (loxodrome). It all stinks of Freemasonic involvement. Stinks may be too strong a word. "Influenced" is better.

Edited July 21, 2024 by RoyalCraftiness

[Light-of-Truth]

On 7/21/2024 at 3:04 PM, RoyalCraftiness said:

3 x 62 is 186. Don't you have a thing for that number? It's a July 5th suggestion isn't it? On July 5th 1610, John Guy's expedition of 40 colonists left England to colonize Newfoundland. 

He got the 3 cents denomination in the stamp series that has Bacon on the 6 cents. Guy settled at Cuper's Cove colony on behalf of the Society of Merchant Venturers as a result of the work of the expeditions of Gilbert (whom Dee had trained in Geometry prior to his expeditions) to claim the land for Elizabeth I in previous voyages.  The place is called Cupids, Newfoundland, today.

On day 186 in 1776, July 4th, (it was a leap year) the 13 colonies declared their independence from England.

In Freemasonry, this day has the peculiar, but understandable reputation of being the 4th day of he 27th week. 4x27 is by definition the perfect ashlar's perimeter (108).

We should notice that Guy being 3 and Bacon 6 has some potential for recognition. Together that is 36 and 36x3 is 108.  3x6=18, and that is relevant to Dee's "art of perfect navigation" scheme due to the 18 being the compliment of the 72 degrees which is the constant heading of this standrd rhumb line (loxodrome). It all stinks of Freemasonic involvement. Stinks may be too strong a word. "Influenced" is better.

To respond quickly as I am still finishing (trying to finish) other tasks, it was on July 2nd when they declared independence.

https://prologue.blogs.archives.gov/2014/07/02/john-adams-vision-of-july-4-was-july-2/

The 4th became the day of celebration, but July was most likely planned as the day for a few reasons.

Most years July 2 is Day 183 with 182 days before it and 182 days after it. The middle day of the of the year.

Using the 24 letter alphabet codes that were in use during Bacon's lifetime, we see some cool Seal numbers.

ONE EIGHTY THREE is 157 Simple and 365 Kaye cipher.

ONE EIGHTY TWO is 157 Simple and 287 Kaye cipher.

July 2nd is Day 183 most years. On Leap Years it is Day 184. Then it is Day 182 from the end of the year with 183 days before it.

In the 364 Days Sonnets design the first half ends with the last Line of the first half of the Sonnets, "Shall profit thee,and much inrich thy booke." That is Line 1078 of the Sonnets and Line 14 of Sonnet 77. That point is always the end of Day 182 (157/287) whether it is a Leap Year or not. The date changes every three years, but the Day numbers stay the same.

Day 183 begins Sonnet 78 and the second half of the the Sonnets design with Day 183 (157/365) which is usually July 2.

https://www.light-of-truth.com/pyramid-GMT.php#Line1078

SO oft haue I inuok'd thee for my Muse,
And found such faire assistance in my verse,
As euery Alien pen hath got my vse,
And vnder thee their poesie disperse.

To me, that makes July 2nd the "perfect" day to celebrate.

JULY TWO is 117 Simple and 58 Reverse cipher.

JOHN DEE is 58 Simple and 117 Reverse cipher.

Not sure when they coined, "UNITED STATES", but I am confident they knew that using their 26 letter alphabet numbers that UNITED STATES adds up to 157 Simple and 287 Kaye cipher.

But the celebration day was shifted to the 4th. Why?

On 7/21/2024 at 3:04 PM, RoyalCraftiness said:

In Freemasonry, this day has the peculiar, but understandable reputation of being the 4th day of he 27th week. 4x27 is by definition the perfect ashlar's perimeter (108).

Interesting thought.

Over the years I've entertained many ideas about July 4 and some may even be possible. Here is one idea I have been thinking of recently:

FOURTH OF JULY is 177 Simple cipher using the same 26 letter alphabet they used for coining the name of Bacon's New Atlantis, but we all know that 177 is the Simple cipher for WILLIAM SHAKESPEARE in the 24 letter numbers.

So Bacon is well represented overtly with the United States and the Seal numbers, John Dee may be cleverly acknowledged, and maybe even William Shakespeare gets a wink. 😉

 

 

 

 

[RoyalCraftiness]

4 hours ago, Light-of-Truth said:

To respond quickly as I am still finishing (trying to finish) other tasks, it was on July 2nd when they declared independence.

https://prologue.blogs.archives.gov/2014/07/02/john-adams-vision-of-july-4-was-july-2/

The 4th became the day of celebration, but July was most likely planned as the day for a few reasons.

Most years July 2 is Day 183 with 182 days before it and 182 days after it. The middle day of the of the year.

Using the 24 letter alphabet codes that were in use during Bacon's lifetime, we see some cool Seal numbers.

ONE EIGHTY THREE is 157 Simple and 365 Kaye cipher.

ONE EIGHTY TWO is 157 Simple and 287 Kaye cipher.

July 2nd is Day 183 most years. On Leap Years it is Day 184. Then it is Day 182 from the end of the year with 183 days before it.

In the 364 Days Sonnets design the first half ends with the last Line of the first half of the Sonnets, "Shall profit thee,and much inrich thy booke." That is Line 1078 of the Sonnets and Line 14 of Sonnet 77. That point is always the end of Day 182 (157/287) whether it is a Leap Year or not. The date changes every three years, but the Day numbers stay the same.

Day 183 begins Sonnet 78 and the second half of the the Sonnets design with Day 183 (157/365) which is usually July 2.

https://www.light-of-truth.com/pyramid-GMT.php#Line1078

SO oft haue I inuok'd thee for my Muse,
And found such faire assistance in my verse,
As euery Alien pen hath got my vse,
And vnder thee their poesie disperse.

To me, that makes July 2nd the "perfect" day to celebrate.

JULY TWO is 117 Simple and 58 Reverse cipher.

JOHN DEE is 58 Simple and 117 Kaye cipher.

Not sure when they coined, "UNITED STATES", but I am confident they knew that using their 26 letter alphabet numbers that UNITED STATES adds up to 157 Simple and 287 Kaye cipher.

But the celebration day was shifted to the 4th. Why?

Interesting thought.

Over the years I've entertained many ideas about July 4 and some may even be possible. Here is one idea I have been thinking of recently:

FOURTH OF JULY is 177 Simple cipher using the same 26 letter alphabet they used for coining the name of Bacon's New Atlantis, but we all know that 177 is the Simple cipher for WILLIAM SHAKESPEARE in the 24 letter numbers.

So Bacon is well represented overtly with the United States and the Seal numbers, John Dee may be cleverly acknowledged, and maybe even William Shakespeare gets a wink. 😉

 

 

 

 

There's a problem with that. There are literally millions of expressions that you can show give you 186, or any other number for that matter. A two-fold correspondence with another similar numbering scheme still doesn't get you anywhere close to showing a 1:1 relationship between symbol and meaning. You'd need to claim you know it applies.  It's impossible to convert a number/symbol to a single meaning.  186th day converts precisely to (7 day/week x 26 weeks) +4 days. The Freemasonic tradition evens gives you the fact that it is days that are the unit which 186 relates to.  July 4th, 1776 was day 186.

You only have to compare that to the existing Masonic iconography to see that the 4 x 27 is the perfect ashlar of Freemasonry. Day 186 has a perfect day connotation.  I don't even know why you would question it and desire to subjugate that with speculations based in Shakespeare stuff. The 108, if it comes from anywhere with familiarity, is from geometry. It's the interior angle of the pentagon. That makes it a close cousin to the five pointed star and an excellent avenue to suggest that DeVere's impeccable personal character was the model for Freemasonry and the United States (a five pointed star is on his coat of arms after all). lol 

Why the polygon with 5 sides ought to matter has to do with the fact that everything on this old Earth was believed to be a representation of the quaternary (principle 4, square). Once you are into the higher polygons you are dabbling in other worldly, spiritual sounding suggestions. 

Edited July 22, 2024 by RoyalCraftiness

[Light-of-Truth]

21 hours ago, RoyalCraftiness said:

There's a problem with that. There are literally millions of expressions that you can show give you 186, or any other number for that matter. A two-fold correspondence with another similar numbering scheme still doesn't get you anywhere close to showing a 1:1 relationship between symbol and meaning. You'd need to claim you know it applies.  It's impossible to convert a number/symbol to a single meaning.

I won't claim to have connected July 4 to the Sonnets any more than I have done for all these years which nothing important. For me, July 2 is the Day. But, I have not been familiar with any Freemason significance of Day 186 before. I may have read something in the past, but I have no recall of anything before you mentioned it.

22 hours ago, RoyalCraftiness said:

186th day converts precisely to (7 day/week x 26 weeks) +4 days. The Freemasonic tradition evens gives you the fact that it is days that are the unit which 186 relates to.  July 4th, 1776 was day 186.

OK, I get it. 🙂

22 hours ago, RoyalCraftiness said:

The 108, if it comes from anywhere with familiarity, is from geometry. It's the interior angle of the pentagon. That makes it a close cousin to the five pointed star and an excellent avenue to suggest that DeVere's impeccable personal character was the model for Freemasonry and the United States (a five pointed star is on his coat of arms after all). lol 

That makes my stomach hurt! LOL

[RoyalCraftiness]

Supposed to be at Mahone Bay today, but it's raining cats and dogs. Was looking forward to getting as close to the Mahone Bay point as possible.

Being stuck inside, I had a deeper look into the the 3 FB pairs to see if there's any discernable geomtrical relationships between points I,H,F,C,D and E.

Things start to congeal when you take each letter involved and use its center. The circle that gets defined by the points IFC  gets cut by a line using points HD. That's 5 of the 6 points involved. One can draw the line AI and the two lines intersect on the middle letter in SHA, H.

A recurring theme in much of the composition used in art is a line going through a circle.  LP is a chord on the circle in the image below. To find the center of the circle one only has to draw a perpendicular from the chord ends and cross the points where they intersect the circle (points R and T). Point J is the geometric center. With that we can determine some angles. JLP and JPL and both 33 degrees (cool). LJP is 114 degrees. We've seen this before, but let's look at some things first. Point H gave us the line, but we can now see that we can define it by calling it the intersect point of W (mid point of chord  RT) through I.

The center J through I, defines a point Z on line HD. ZL is the same length as chord LP. Z can be joined to T to produce a 72 degree angle with the line going through TP.

None of this seems to be random at all. The six (F,B) points all have a role in a regular geometry.

What's suspicious in the plaque is that the three perpendiculars to the line HD are going through Os. O,O,O is a masonic cue to the three aspects of the creator.

 

It's not a scheme that is new to me. I've seen this used before here:

The three points O,O,O can be shown to involving the FB points like this:

This lends more weight to the idea that position of the F,B points was carefully chosen to suggest something that is found elsewhere.

 

Edited July 24, 2024 by RoyalCraftiness

[Light-of-Truth]

5 hours ago, RoyalCraftiness said:

Supposed to be at Mahone Bay today, but it's raining cats and dogs. Was looking forward to getting as close to the Mahone Bay point as possible.

I can only imagine being there!

I've been dealing with CrowdStrike ripples for days. So many daily expectations disrupted for so many clients. UGH

Nothing I can do, but it still takes a lot of time working around everything

I own stock in CrowdStrike (ouch), knowing they are HUGE in the global cybersecurity industry. I know I would hate to be the person who was the final step in sending that corrupt update! Yikes!

Imagine the entire internet and communication grid coming down at once. It would be a mess.

But anyway back on track, I like the three pairs of FB. 🙂

Will try to get back in a bit...

[Light-of-Truth]

9 hours ago, RoyalCraftiness said:

Supposed to be at Mahone Bay today, but it's raining cats and dogs. Was looking forward to getting as close to the Mahone Bay point as possible.

I searched SirBacon.org to see if Mahone Bay has come up before you popped in. Indeed it has, from the late very good friend of SirBacon.org, Penn Leary.

https://sirbacon.org/archives/epdf.Penn Leary pub_the-second-cryptographic-shakespeare.pdf

This was one of the first books Lawrence sent to me in my early Baconian days (late 1990's). I remember reading this one with wide-open eyes! Penn Leary was an early inspiration to me. What's funny, even though I have no memory of the words below, I know I read them taking it all in. I suspect some of it made into my subconscious. 😉

Chapter 2
A very long time ago, and once upon a time, Marian and I set out for the province of Nova Scotia, a little-known peninsula in far northeastern Canada. Marian is a gentlewoman, the Lady to whom I refer as my first wife when she burns the biscuits.

Some arrangement was made to relieve me, for a few weeks, from the tedium of the law business; I think my father agreed to handle a vexatious Motion for a More Definite Statement, a dilatory exercise then pending upon my not very busy calendar.

Outside of that, in 1952, we were free. I had read some books about Oak Island just off the coast of Nova Scotia where, it was said, a mighty treasure was buried. We gassed up our three-holer Buick to transport us the 2500 miles to Mahone Bay. Time was short so we drove day and night, relieving each other at the controls of our powerful eight-cylinder roadeating machine. Treasure and Romance were beckoning us on to a reputed golden glory-hole yawning on Oak Island.

In Canada the highway was not then of the best. Grinding along the gravel roads in the darkness, and going as fast as I could, I had no reason to suspect that I had embarked upon such a long trail. As it happens, that summer journey has not yet ended.

We found the coastal village of Mahone Bay and had dinner at its only tea room. Fishing and digging for treasure were the local industries so fish was all there was to eat. I had tea instead.

The digging on the Island had been going on since 1795. Most treasures depend for a living upon an old map and a tradition; it is sure and certain that jewels or gold were once buried but no one knows just where. But the reverse is true of Oak Island. The particular spot where its treasure was interred has been fixed, within a few yards, for 192 years. The treasure itself may have been put in its tomb a century or more before that. There is no scrap of evidence, other than conjecture, to connect it with any person or age. The character of the treasure is equally uncertain.

 

[Light-of-Truth]

10 hours ago, RoyalCraftiness said:

None of this seems to be random at all. The six (F,B) points all have a role in a regular geometry.

What's suspicious in the plaque is that the three perpendiculars to the line HD are going through Os. O,O,O is a masonic cue to the three aspects of the creator.

And we know I enjoy SHA (1881) in the central point! 😉

 

[RoyalCraftiness]

42 minutes ago, Light-of-Truth said:

I searched SirBacon.org to see if Mahone Bay has come up before you popped in. Indeed it has, from the late very good friend of SirBacon.org, Penn Leary.

https://sirbacon.org/archives/epdf.Penn Leary pub_the-second-cryptographic-shakespeare.pdf

This was one of the first books Lawrence sent to me in my early Baconian days (late 1990's). I remember reading this one with wide-open eyes! Penn Leary was an early inspiration to me. What's funny, even though I have no memory of the words below, I know I read them taking it all in. I suspect some of it made into my subconscious. 😉

Chapter 2
Avery long time ago, and once upon a time, Marian and I set out for the province of Nova Scotia, a little-known peninsula in far northeastern Canada. Marian is a gentlewoman, the Lady to whom I refer as my first wife when she burns the biscuits.

Some arrangement was made to relieve me, for a few weeks, from the tedium of the law business; I think my father agreed to handle a vexatious Motion for a More Definite Statement, a dilatory exercise then pending upon my not very busy calendar.

Outside of that, in 1952, we were free. I had read some books about Oak Island just off the coast of Nova Scotia where, it was said, a mighty treasure was buried. We gassed up our three-holer Buick to transport us the 2500 miles to Mahone Bay. Time was short so we drove day and night, relieving each other at the controls of our powerful eight-cylinder roadeating machine. Treasure and Romance were beckoning us on to a reputed golden glory-hole yawning on Oak Island.

In Canada the highway was not then of the best. Grinding along the gravel roads in the darkness, and going as fast as I could, I had no reason to suspect that I had embarked upon such a long trail. As it happens, that summer journey has not yet ended.

We found the coastal village of Mahone Bay and had dinner at its only tea room. Fishing and digging for treasure were the local industries so fish was all there was to eat. I had tea instead.

The digging on the Island had been going on since 1795. Most treasures depend for a living upon an old map and a tradition; it is sure and certain that jewels or gold were once buried but no one knows just where. But the reverse is true of Oak Island. The particular spot where its treasure was interred has been fixed, within a few yards, for 192 years. The treasure itself may have been put in its tomb a century or more before that. There is no scrap of evidence, other than conjecture, to connect it with any person or age. The character of the treasure is equally uncertain.

 

That's a perfect example of the nonsense that lives on about OI which is taken from pulp fiction popular from the 1860s onward. There is no evidence there ever a treasure search there in 1795. In fact, that is the date when the property in question (lot 18) was sold to the adult John Smith who later fairy tales has it was one of the youthful adventurers who discovered the pit on a jaunt to a mysterious island at that date. Smith had lived on the island with his mother since the mid 1780s. The island had significant habitation since 1763. Lot 18, where all this intrigue is said to have taken place, was owned by a German merchant from Lunenburg on the business end of the island. It had been the business end of the island since 1753-1758. 1795 is Masonically inspired. It is 33 years after Charles Morris' plans for the island were executed in 1762. Morris was an influential Freemason and the understudy of Erasmus James Philipps whose first Nova Scotia lodge was established at Annapolis Royal, NS, a place I am visiting Thursday. 

If an honest historical treatment was ever written about Oak Island which was free from repeating the unsubstantiated fantasies of amateur speculators quoting their predecessors it would be obvious to everyone that we are dealing with a symbolic story painted in geometrically inspired themes that has truly gone amok.

 

 

[RoyalCraftiness]

1 hour ago, Light-of-Truth said:

And we know I enjoy SHA (1881) in the central point! 😉

 

Yeah, I'm not sure what to make of these points. They just seem to be there on those verticals. That middle one becomes an apex for an isosceles 40 degree base angle pair. That's noteworthy. It's "freaky" that the Novum Organum composition appears from the 6 points treated pretty simply.

Edited July 24, 2024 by RoyalCraftiness

[Light-of-Truth]

9 minutes ago, RoyalCraftiness said:

That's a perfect example of the nonsense that lives on about OI which is taken from pulp fiction popular from the 1860s onward. There is no evidence there ever a treasure search there in 1795. In fact, that is the date when the property in question (lot 18) was sold to the adult John Smith who later fairy tales has it was one of the youthful adventurers who discovered the pit on a jaunt to a mysterious island at that date. Smith had lived on the island with his mother since the mid 1780s. The island had significant habitation since 1763. Lot 18, where all this intrigue is said to have taken place, was owned by a German merchant from Lunenburg on the business end of the island. It had been the business end of the island since 1753-1758. 1795 is Masonically inspired. It is 33 years after Charles Morris' plans for the island were executed in 1762. Morris was an influential Freemason and the understudy of Erasmus James Philipps whose first Nova Scotia lodge was established at Annapolis Royal, NS, a place I am visiting Thursday.

Regardless of the above, which I tend feel you know more than most people since you live and have ties there, Penn Leary was on a treasure hunt just like me. Peter Dawkins also speaks of a treasure hunt. Oak Island never left an impact in my brain, but there is a lot of us who for whatever reason hunt treasures.

15 minutes ago, RoyalCraftiness said:

If an honest historical treatment was ever written about Oak Island which was free from repeating the unsubstantiated fantasies of amateur speculators quoting their predecessors it would be obvious to everyone that we are dealing with a symbolic story painted in geometrically inspired themes that has truly gone amok.

Do it!! 🙂

[RoyalCraftiness]

Just now, Light-of-Truth said:

Regardless of the above, which I tend feel you know more than most people since you live and have ties there, Penn Leary was on a treasure hunt just like me. Peter Dawkins also speaks of a treasure hunt. Oak Island never left an impact in my brain, but there is a lot of us who for whatever reason hunt treasures.

Do it!! 🙂

I'll write the book and bury it in an undisclosed location with its own mystery attached to it if I ever write anything.

[RoyalCraftiness]

2 minutes ago, Light-of-Truth said:

Regardless of the above, which I tend feel you know more than most people since you live and have ties there, Penn Leary was on a treasure hunt just like me. Peter Dawkins also speaks of a treasure hunt. Oak Island never left an impact in my brain, but there is a lot of us who for whatever reason hunt treasures.

Do it!! 🙂

You are on a quest to know who you are, aren't you? This entire business is about identity and forging one.

[RoyalCraftiness]

9 hours ago, Light-of-Truth said:

Regardless of the above, which I tend feel you know more than most people since you live and have ties there, Penn Leary was on a treasure hunt just like me. Peter Dawkins also speaks of a treasure hunt. Oak Island never left an impact in my brain, but there is a lot of us who for whatever reason hunt treasures.

Do it!! 🙂

I don't know what I know, but I know what I should not know. I know to not believe. Authority when it is perceived comes via confidence. Confidence comes from discipline. Discipline starts with self awareness. You have to have it in you to know that you can know the knowable if you are disciplined.

Edited July 24, 2024 by RoyalCraftiness

[Light-of-Truth]

11 minutes ago, RoyalCraftiness said:

You are on a quest to know who you are, aren't you? This entire business is about identity and forging one.

And don't forget about getting old and worn out needing something to make one want to keep on living. 😉

I am very fortunate to be on a treasure hunt. And since I was kid it has been invigorating and exciting.

My 89 year old Dad in Assisted Living is bored to death, wanting to die. When we go out to lunch he has a blast, and that is what he lives for. But I have tried to help him find a passion he can pursue for years. My wife is retired, and is bored except watching TV. I wish she had a passion beyond that.

Who are we treasure hunters? Why do we do it?

For me, I get a thrill from it. Even today stumbling on old Baconiana with synchronicity connecting here and there, it fires me up.

One of the favorite years of my life I spent wandering around the public lands and wilderness of the Colorado high country looking for arrowheads. Such thrilling moments when some strange magic would make me look in the right place and pick up a beautiful arrowhead that had not been held in human hands for maybe hundreds or thousands of years. Whew, oh boy. Nothing like it.

Who are we? Why do we do it?

[RoyalCraftiness]

9 hours ago, Light-of-Truth said:

And don't forget about getting old and worn out needing something to make one want to keep on living. 😉

I am very fortunate to be on a treasure hunt. And since I was kid it has been invigorating and exciting.

My 89 year old Dad in Assisted Living is bored to death, wanting to die. When we go out to lunch he has a blast, and that is what he lives for. But I have tried to help him find a passion he can pursue for years. My wife retied, is bored except watching TV. I wish she had a passion beyond that.

Who are we treasure hunters? Why do we do it?

For me, I get a thrill from it. Even today stumbling on old Baconiana with synchronicity connecting here and there, it fires me up.

One of the favorite years of my life I spent wandering around the public lands and wilderness of the Colorado high country looking for arrowheads. Such thrilling moments when some strange magic would make me look in the right place and pick up a beautiful arrowhead that had not been held in human hands for maybe hundreds or thousands of years. Whew, oh boy. Nothing like it.

Who are we? Why do we do it?

Grab a handful of sand then and ponder how the heavier elements in it had to made in a solar furnace at some point in the past. I would hate to be able to know how each grain got to where it is. I am happy to not be part of that entire journey. Funny things is that almost anything you can grab was one caught up in a living thing and it has the potential to return to another form of that. Information which is persisting in time is managing to operate on substrates. Life isn't the stuff it is made up of.  It is busy organizing information  for future recollection. Someone who made a point embodied information in it that reaches you. On an information level that has been a limited success for the life current. It's why Shakespeare encourages you to put down your thoughts.

Edited July 24, 2024 by RoyalCraftiness

[RoyalCraftiness]

10 hours ago, RoyalCraftiness said:

Yeah, I'm not sure what to make of these points. They just seem to be there on those verticals. That middle one becomes an apex for an isosceles 40 degree base angle pair. That's noteworthy. It's "freaky" that the Novum Organum composition appears from the 6 points treated pretty simply.

We have a problem Houston.  We have it in the form of Nolan's Cross making an appearance in this 6 point inspired geometry.

The three cone positions that were given precisely by Amundsen at OI by GPS are seen here with the 40, 50 and 26.6 degree angles echoed. The one stone position which has always caused a problem for the OI fans with its uncertainty has been the top stone which is alleged to be anywhere from 144 feet to 147 feet from the crossing point. In the plaque, with the use of the O,O,O points we can see that these 3 values are all plausible and within the range of the rounding over of the angle size.

I have no immediate explanation for why this appears. It may have to appear because of the regular geometry that comes out of the absolutely random looking 6 F, B points.

They clearly aren't randomly given points because they do mirror the geometric center of the frame (via their centroid), they mimic the Novum Organum title page composition scheme via a simple circle and chord suggestion and now they suggest a Cross that Nolan produced only in ca. 1982 when we explore the three O,O,O point suggestion.

I'd be less rattled by this had we started with a recognizable symmetry with the F,B points.  I don't see any other way to get to this result but to have identified the only two letters used with a frequency of 3 in those 220. It is possible to show that Nolan's Cross  is easily constructed by just symmetry considerations, but we get there by building to that with irregular looking points here.  Neat trick. Another of Petr's "miracles"? lol

 

 

Edited July 24, 2024 by RoyalCraftiness

[Light-of-Truth]

9 hours ago, RoyalCraftiness said:

I have no immediate explanation for why this appears. It may have to appear because of the regular geometry that comes out of the absolutely random looking 6 F, B points.

Maybe this is a treasure map. 😉