Parallels in the Bacon-Shakespeare Works

[A Phoenix]

On Theatre & The Stage.

[Light-of-Truth]

Bacon said, in plain text for the world to read what he wrote as Bacon:

"...they would make you a king in a play, who, when one would think he standeth in great majesty and felicity, he is troubled to say his part."

And that King is often hinted at being named "Will", and the numbers back it up. 🙂

 

[A Phoenix]

On Wealth.

[A Phoenix]

On Goodness.

[A Phoenix]

On Medicine.

[A Phoenix]

On Wonder.

[A Phoenix]

On Flowers, Plants and Trees.

[A Phoenix]

On Law.

[Light-of-Truth]

Funny, I was The Merry Wives of Windsor in Act 3, Scene 3 because of a "basket" and Hang" close together. But Act 4, Scene 1 takes the cake.

Talk about an in-our-face hint of William being Bacon's born first name:

Also 33 non-italic words skipping the words in parenthesis as well between Bacon and (childe).

🙂

Edited May 12, 2022 by Light-of-Truth

[Allisnum2er]

Another edifying "Spot the Likeness" ! 😃 Thank you A Phoenix ! ❤️

And great find Rob !

I love the fact that skipping the words in parenthesis between Bacon and (childe) we have 33 words ( BACON simple cipher)

and 143 characters ( QUEEN ELIZABETH simple cipher). But hush ! ... "never name her".😉

[Light-of-Truth]

143! Thanks Yann!!

On page 51 in Merry Wives is the "basket" and "Hang" thing I spent some time on. Less than 33 words between them, couldn't quite get 33. Can't always do that, but seems usually in Shakespeare it happens. 🙂

I did see 33 lines from one of the words or some other way, the line ended with in italics, "Windsor castle". Thus began another tangent, or thread in my mind. Swallows still fitting while I try to focus on "real" life. (What a joke, but gotta pay the bills).

Tangent takes me back to William I, the Conqueror. In my mind, "Hanging BAsket, William I".

Then A. Phoenix, totally connected to the Synchronicity of Bacon and brought up "Hang hog' is Latin for bacon".

The Merry Wives of Windsor, Act 4, Scene 1.

I'd say that from my first year of being a Baconian 25 years ago I have been aware of this line. Of course!

I'd also say every year since it has popped up wherever my brain goes with Bacon stuff. It is core to our foundation. Shakespeare wrote, "Hang hog' is Latin for bacon".

We all (Baconians) know this.

But have I ever looked at it? For real?

It was 2001 when I got the "William Tudor I" passion. I assume I never looked at The Merry Wives of Windsor, Act 4, Scene 1 since. Or I would see all the Williams in parenthesis with "(childe)", "(Faire)", "(Lapis)", and , "(o'man)" which I have not figured out yet.

https://internetshakespeare.uvic.ca/Library/facsimile/book/SLNSW_F1/71/?work=&zoom=1275

So I see 67 words after "bacon" is "(childe)". The phrase was, "never name her (childe)" when at number 67 would be "FRANCIS" Simple cipher.

But "(William)" in parenthesis has been prominent. So in parenthesis (childe) could be replaced with (William). At the 67 count of words, the Simple cipher of FRANCIS, Bacon's first name. But did he have two first names?? I say so; William and Francis.

Yann pointed out what I missed, 143 characters is the Simple cipher of QUEEN ELIZABETH where Bacon says, "never name her".

I've not spent much time crunching numbers today, been busy, but the back of my brain has been full of swallows (three?) having fits with my mind.

Not doing the "work", but integrating the little work I have done. I can do that when doing almost everything else.

So now I think this moment in the Shakespeare's works (Wives 4:1) that I knew about and missed for over two decades, is the second most important clue he left us that Bacon was born as William. I am the "Foole", have had the carrot in front of me for so many years yet I always looked elsewhere thinking "this discovery" is done and finished. LOL

I am the Fool!

The first clue, the possible most important plain text message in all of Shakespeare is when Bacon says, "for my name is Will" in Sonnet 136.

136 is Simple cipher for BACON-SHAKESPEARE.

The "Will" concept really begins in full a blown message and story in Sonnet 135 with so many "Will" popping up in context with Elizabeth's purpose and themes.

135 is Simple cipher for BACON (33) plus 102.

ONE HUNDRED TWO is 157 Simple and 287 Kaye the same as WILLIAM TUDOR I.

Now I have seen what I missed with Hang hog' is Latin for bacon, with three swallows throwing a total FIT party in my mind, realizing the next biggest clue to who Bacon was at birth is exactly where Baconians have been celebrating all this time not seeing the deeper meaning. Bacon does not pop up a lot in Shakespeare in plain text! In cipher, everywhere, plain text, only at very specific places.

(William) IS the (childe) (67, first name FRANCIS) who he could never name, and he wasn't even able to "name her" (143, QUEEN ELIZABETH).

Listen, this is a real actual dialog Bacon (William) had as a child, not as or with William though (in parenthesis) . But seriously, this is part of a dialog Bacon as a child had and he left this for us to enjoy (I believe 100%).

Those swallows!! UGH! Love them in the end, but my real life is in a fit!!

😉

A. Phoenix, I have a question.

I know as a Scholar the "William" concept can not be spoken. You, Peter, anyone who is earning respect in public. What me and Allisnum2er is doing is free and wild. We can do whatever we want, and speak it out.  I think we see enough cipher stuff that it may be actual Truth. Yet we may never produce any tangible hard physical evidence in any form, except the one document that was written in ink the moment Bacon was born. We'd need to ask the current Queen Elizabeth? She'd likely not share it.

I'll say it would not have been lost in a random pile of papers, nor buried below sea level anywhere in the world! LOL

In the Colman genealogy there was a William the Second after William I, the Conqueror. 

So "if", only saying "if", Bacon was born as William Tudor, I assume he would be William Tudor the First if anyone followed him.

But would he also be "William the Third"? In another context yet valid?

Might open a few tangent doors for cipher seekers! 🙂

...

In time I am confident even skeptics will have to accept Bacon was born as William. Elizabeth's "Will". Nobody ever called him that, he never heard anyone call him William. Thus not letters, no notes, nothing. No slip ups, nobody ever called him Will as a child. He was always Francis.

No evidence.

But the Truth is out there, with us. We can know it, don't need to speak it.

It's a secret, maybe even today.

Yet even the highest respected Scholars can be in the club of secrets and silently pass on valuable hints for future generations of us when most people today are totally oblivious today and would miss any even of the most obvious clues. 😉

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

[Allisnum2er]

Here is, I believe, the purpose of the hang basket in The Merry Wives of Windsor. 😊

I am also probably a Fool but ...

https://internetshakespeare.uvic.ca/Library/facsimile/book/SLNSW_F1/69/?zoom=1558

Edited May 13, 2022 by Allisnum2er

[Light-of-Truth]

Double excellency indeed! 🙂

[A Phoenix]

Rob and Yann,

It is entirely possible that FB was given a different birth name as Francis was not a usual royal name in England (but common in France). He would have been William III (although a first Tudor William). It’s not unprecedented that monarchs acceding to the throne had a different name from their birth name; Queen Elizabeth II’s father George VI was actually Albert (but then he wasn’t expected to come to the throne – only after his brother’s surprise abdication.) All entirely possible and it could be:

1) There is documentation that supports this but we don’t know where

2) There is confirmation of this hidden in acrostics, anagrams, emblems and ciphers

3) Secrets of this magnitude were not documented at all anywhere

We don’t know but favour number 2 which is where you and Yann come in Rob. We are so thankful that you and Yann do ‘free and wild’ – where would the world ever have been without ‘free and wild’.

"Imagination is more important than knowledge. For knowledge is limited, whereas imagination embraces the entire world, stimulating progress, giving birth to evolution."  Einstein

Edited May 13, 2022 by A Phoenix

[Light-of-Truth]

I usually try to keep one foot on the ground, but both feet are floating way up this morning. I could barely sleep, repeating the dialog in my head switching William with Francis all night.

"Francis, how many Numbers in Nownes?"

"What is Lapis, Francis?"

If Bacon was William, would he be the Second (William II)? There was a William the Second according to Morgan Colman. Or would be he William III? I don't know how that works with Kings.

https://collections.library.yale.edu/catalog/11690530

 

[A Phoenix]

Hi Rob,

Just quickly checked up and William I reigned from 1066-1087 and was succeeded by his son William (Rufus) II who reigned from 1087-1100. So, if Francis was William he would have been William III.

[A Phoenix]

On Life.

[Light-of-Truth]

1 hour ago, A Phoenix said:

Hi Rob,

Just quickly checked up and William I reigned from 1066-1087 and was succeeded by his son William (Rufus) II who reigned from 1087-1100. So, if Francis was William he would have been William III.

So he would have been William Tudor I (William Tudor the First), but also King William III (King William the Third).

Good to know. I wonder what will pop up. 😉

 

[A Phoenix]

On Light & Darkness.

[A Phoenix]

On Learning.

[A Phoenix]

On Humanity.

[A Phoenix]

English Proverbs 1.

[A Phoenix]

English Proverbs 2.

[A Phoenix]

Latin Quotations.

[A Phoenix]

Spanish Proverbs.