Jump to content

Was it?


Recommended Posts

Sonnet 86 is one of three special sonnets. The reason is that if its number is added to its 'mirror image' the result is 154:

86 + 68 = 154

77 + 77 = 154

and the same applies to the third example.

       That said, I was reading Sonnet 86 when I realized that it begins with these five letters:  WAS IT and the very same five-letter phrase is repeated at the start of line five.

Was it a coincidence that line one starts with five letters and are repeated in line five?

Is there another example of a Sonnet repeating the first two words of a line?

Could it be that we are to consider WAS IT as IT WAS? 

   I tried it with numbers: WAS IT : 21 + 1 + 18    +    9 + 19 = 68.

Would you believe it? IT WAS bears the mirror image number of the sonnet 86.

But hold on there: WAS IT makes W IS AT which, in number form becomes W is 1 +19 or W is 20, and the first 5 letters of line 5, sonnet 20 say AN EYE, which, in numbers becomes 1 + 13  and 5 + 23 + 5 or, translating back to letters:  DEE and BACON.

I find such obscure things of the greatest interest.

       Back at sonnet 86: I find that it bears the same number as VERULAM.

A Roman name. And it's 'mirror image' 68 matches A SECRET.

Actually, if A = 1 and Roman I = 1 then why not  say A SECRET = I FRANCIS, for the numbers are the same.

This would mean the number of this sonnet 86, taking into account the number of IT WAS (or WAS IT)  hides I FRANCIS VERULAM.

                              Or perhaps even    IT WAS I FRANCIS VERULAM.

Notice that I don't say what the cipher type is meant to be: simple, so-called "kay", etc, because I don't think such where used by Bacon or Dee, or anyone. Oh I know Bacon mentions "Kay" and others, but there's no evidence whatsoever to show that he ever used them. I cannot see the purpose of making life even more difficult than it is. I use (and have always used) the 24 letter alphabet, and keep strictly to the system understood by John Dee: each letter represents a number from 1 to 24. Dee is the only one who shows examples of the alphabet in terms of number and symbol-structure. He's the only one who mentions "Gemetria".

I do have a suspicion that the end game of all this numerical jiggery-pokery was to finalize the alphabet we now know and love: the 26 letters representing Francis Bacon for as long as the English-Latin speaking world have eyes to read.

 

  • Like 1

The man in the moone was not a buffoon

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...