To The Memorie of the deceased Authour Maister W. Shakespeare by Leonard Digges & the Rosicrucian-Freemasonic Stratford Monument commissioned by Francis Bacon

[Allisnum2er]

The Triangle and the Circle are inscribed in a Square and I find that the figure is very similar to EMBLEMA XXI of ATALANTA FUGIENS published in 1617.

https://furnaceandfugue.org/atalanta-fugiens/emblem21.html

A circle for the man and wife provide,

Which make quadrangular with equal side,

That trigonal, resulting in a Sphere:

And then the blessed Stone to you will appear.

If this too high and too abstruse you find,

Geometry will soon inform your mind.

Still in my view, it could be a reference to the famous page 53 of COMEDIES ...

https://internetshakespeare.uvic.ca/Library/facsimile/book/SLNSW_F1/71/?zoom=1275

To be continued ...

 

 

[A Phoenix]

Hi Yann,

WOW. WOW. WOW.

Different level. Awesome.

[Allisnum2er]

From the previous Square, we can draw a "HOUSE".

The "House" contains 84 words (still skipping the I. that is a number).

For me, 84 is the simple cipher of ELIZABETH.

And I can link this "HOUSE" with the one that I discovered on page 84 of Histories and that represents the constellation CEPHEUS. ( see my first video -1623)

 

Regarding the number 84 and this Essay, I let you appreciate the Armory on page 84 of "The Accedens of Armory" 😉 

https://archive.org/details/accedenceofarmor00legh/page/n183/mode/2up

But that's not all ! I think that this "HOUSE" is more than just a reference to CEPHEUS (74).

To understand, we have to take a look at the comments of Macrobus on "The Dream of Scipio" and more precisely the chapter talking about the septenary.

https://archive.org/details/ARes37605/page/32/mode/2up

On page 33, we learned the meaning of the Septenary as the union of the Quaternary and the Ternary.

And on page 31, we learn that the number 7 represents Virginity and is associated with PALLAS/MINERVA.

I think that the use of this simple shape allowed Francis Bacon to make both a reference to his Muse Pallas Athena, to his mother the Virgin Queen and to his princely name WILLIAM TUDOR ( WILLIAM = TUDOR = 74 = CEPHEUS)

BUT THAT'S NOT ALL !

Did you noticed the two Angels on top, standing on one foot ?

I think that it is a reference of a specific passage of the First Folio that is on the 444th leaf of the First Folio

444 = 157 + 287 ( Thank you again to Rob/ Light of Truth)

And 444 is the gematria of MIKDASH the Hebrew for TEMPLE.

This is on this leaf, on the following page, that can be found the famous reference to the ROSY-CROSS.

Notice that the triangle crosses the feet of the two Angels ... This is not by chance !

 

This is a reference to two stars of the constellation GEMINI : TEJAT AND ALMEISA.

The fact is that Petter Admundsen found a reference to these two stars hidden in the First Folio ...

... on page 169 of HISTORIES.

To be continued ...

 

[Allisnum2er]

TEJAT and ALMEISA that represent CASTOR and POLLUX are concealed on page 169.

Once again, I do not think that it is by chance.

Shakespeare's Sonnets were published in 1609.

The Wisdome of the Ancients by Francis Bacon was published in 1609.

16 and 9 are linked to the quartenary and the ternary.

Indeed : 16 = 4x4 and 9 = 3x3

And 16 and 9 remind us the 47th problem of Euclid.

Now, I let you appreciate the three pages 169 of the First Folio and their connection with the actual Shakespeare Monument ...

 

And here is something that I shared with you few months ago.

Finally,

 

 

 

[A Phoenix]

Hi Yann,

You truly are the wonder of the Baconian world.

[Allisnum2er]

1 hour ago, A Phoenix said:

Hi Yann,

You truly are the wonder of the Baconian world.

Many thanks for your very kind words A Phoenix !🙏❤️

Here is a last thing that I forgot to bring up in my presentation.

Regarding the choice of vestment for Shakespeare in the actual Shakespeare Monument,

I learned that it was the vestment of a scholar from Oxford, and I know that for the Oxfordians this is a clue in favor of Edward de Vere the 17th Earl of Oxford.

But what if it was in fact, here again, a reference to one passage of the First Folio ?

https://internetshakespeare.uvic.ca/Library/facsimile/book/SLNSW_F1/406/?zoom=1275

 

[A Phoenix]

Hi Maestro,

Only you see and make these observations and connections.

However, when you point them out and make them manifest-we realise with astonishment that they have been hidden in plain sight for centuries, before you made them visible for the rest of us.

Much love and gratitude.

Phoenix.

[Light-of-Truth]

A. Phoenix, you, for me offer something several times a week for my morning coffee in Florida on the East Coast of America. During my crazy sometimes stressful days I have something to kick around in the back of my head that is exciting providing fuel for my main passion. Thank you for the research.

Yann, you, provide sparkles and mind-candy in a number connected reality that we share, yet your expansive knowledge is beyond my scope and I am ever amazed. Thank you Yann for saving me when I thought I was all alone in this area. OMG, Thank you so much.

I saw one of your triangles when putting up my quick post this morning. I bet you saw it even though I didn't draw it out.

😉

 

[Light-of-Truth]

7 hours ago, Allisnum2er said:

BACON'S WIT is also in play in "Of Truth".

(OF TRUTH = 103 = SHAKESPEARE - Thank you Rob 😊)

Notice that right in the middle (Mediocria firma) of "Of Truth" 

we have  : F. BAC. WIT that stands for Francis BACon WIT

Thanks for using the page from my 1625 copy! 🙂

I have studied, stared, daydreamed, and enjoyed this page so much and here you just brought it all to a Peak on Day 259 in Sonnet 110. You know when I see WIT I see William Tudor I after doing a little jog from W to T and then back to I. If Bacon was born as William Tudor, he would not complete the Seal until he was the First, or William Tudor I which obviously would require William Tudor II. Sadly, that never happened. Yet the memory is left as a monument carved into Bacon's works.

"And count it a Bondage,to fix a Beleef ; Affecting Free-will in Thinking, as well as in Acting."

 

[Allisnum2er]

12 hours ago, Light-of-Truth said:

I saw one of your triangles when putting up my quick post this morning. I bet you saw it even though I didn't draw it out.

Thanks to you Rob for allowing me to use the copy of your 1625 Edition 🙏❤️.

What I shared with you today is what I had in mind in march when I asked you if I could use your beautiful photograph of this page. 😊

Regarding the triangle you're talking about in Sonnet 110, indeed I saw it ! 🙂 More precisely, I saw what looks almost like the mirror image (chiral 😉) of the Triangle mentioned by CJ. I wonder if it is just a coincidence or if it was intended.