The Fraudulent Friedmans

[A Phoenix]

CAPTAIN POWELL, MEMBER OF US CIPHER INTELLIGENCE (MI8) CONFIRMS THE PRESENCE AND SOLUTION OF THE BACON BI-LITERAL CIPHER.

[A Phoenix]

THE DECIPHERED MESSAGE FROM THE SHAKESPEARE FIRST FOLIO CONFIRMING FRANCIS BACON IS SHAKESPEARE.

[A Phoenix]

THE ANONYMOUS AUTHORS OF THE RIVERBANK PUBLICATIONS ON THE BACON BI-LITERAL CIPHER.

[A Phoenix]

The Hints to the Decipherer endorsing the Bacon Bi-literal Cipher as deciphered by Elizabeth Wells Gallup.

[A Phoenix]

Instructions for the Bacon Bi-Literal Cipher in the Hints To The Decipherer.

[A Phoenix]

An Explanation of Bacon's Bi-Literal Cipher in The Hints to the Decipherer.

[Light-of-Truth]

Here at the B'Hive Cipher Department, we strive for discovering and promoting the Truth.

The biliteral cipher is one that could be proven scientifically and also present a Truth. All of the ciphers we kick around here can not be denied by science. Anyone can duplicate what we do using the same techniques. So as a first scientific test they all pass.

The hidden messages we often see are not provable by science. There are infinite possibilities. But science would prove that the one theory we interpret is possible. It works by rules, so it is possible.

Then we think about all the ciphers we've seen and shared. Some scientific probabilities of other interpretations shrink. We see ciphers and patterns and know where to look. Bacon left clues and it is obvious. He left them where it mattered, and there were some rules we follow.

The Friedmans teach a lot of those techniques and rules while deceiving the Starfordians.

I think it's time Stratfordians start to pay attention if they don't want to be embarrassed the day the Truth is provable. 😉

 

[Kate]

On 6/26/2022 at 10:05 AM, A Phoenix said:

THE DECIPHERED MESSAGE FROM THE SHAKESPEARE FIRST FOLIO CONFIRMING FRANCIS BACON IS SHAKESPEARE.

Reading this one AP, should we be looking  more closely for F St A in (throughout) the First Folio? 

[A Phoenix]

Do you mean Kate, via the decipherment of Bacon's Bi-literal Cipher, or his simple and kay cipher systems, or via acrostics and anagrams? Or all of the aforementioned?

 

[Kate]

All, I guess? 

[Allisnum2er]

Hi , I would say that F. St A. is an anagram of FAST and I noticed that when we have the word "fast" , "Bacon" is never far away, the better exemple being on page 222 with the famous FAST BACON in acrostic.

BACON F.St A. 🙂 

[Kate]

Oh yes, I recall the FAST now. Gosh! 

[A Phoenix]

THE ANONYMOUS THE KEYS FOR DECIPHERING THE GREATEST WORK OF SIR FRANCIS BACON  BY THE FRIEDMANS.

[A Phoenix]

ITS AUTHORS UNAMBIGUOUSLY STATE THAT THE BACON BI-LITERAL CIPHER IS PRESENT IN A NUMBER OF ELIZABETHAN AND JACOBEAN WORKS.

[A Phoenix]

THE FINGERPRINTS OF THE FRIEDMANS ARE ALL OVER THE KEYS FOR DECIPHERING THE GREATEST WORK OF SIR FRANCIS BACON .

[Light-of-Truth]

A. Phoenix, I agree they examined and realized what Bacon left in his biliteral cipher. They definitely left us on a path to follow. Describing, explaining, including anagrams/acrostics, number ciphers, and everything else with a few things I have yet to explore.

I hope what they saw will be shown and proven. I suspect it will, one day.

But as a computer person, the two typestyles in Bacon's example is just one example of a binary system. If he did leave his message in biliteral using two typestyles, I am thrilled and cannot wait to see it!!

I will still look for other binary ways to use his example. No luck so far, but pushing 20 years since I tried and I think I am better now at this thing.

Friedmans in their Fraud appear to teach and encourage Baconians while leaving their own Bacon examples in their deceptive Stratfordian pages, as if for us to know the Truth is not what is said publicly. Teach, leave an example, what to do next. Strats never got a clue, they are not cipher people. Yet this is their Baconian cipher "destroyer"! LOL

William was a spy. He knew who Bacon was, knew who Dee was and his role (oo7), and more secrets than we can only imagine. Sworn to secrecy, his life (their lives) depending on it.

Tell a lie, to tell the Truth. It happens.

This is the Stratfordian concrete evidence that held their argument for way too long. Oooops, guess they were fooled.

As long as I have been a Baconian, these following lines comes up in my mind. Years and years meditating on this, the meanings has developed into way more than I ever expected. Like an old oak tree.

Truth may perhaps come to the price of a pearl that showeth best by day; but it will not rise to the price of a diamond or carbuncle, that showeth best in varied lights. A mixture of a lie doth ever add pleasure.

Bacon is not telling us to lie. At all. Read his heart, what he is saying. Friedmans were living examples of this, they lied and just now decades later we are seeing the obvious truth of what they left. Thanks to A. Phoenix!!!

 

 

 

 

Edited June 30, 2022 by Light-of-Truth

[A Phoenix]

BEHIND THE SHIELD OF ANONYMITY THE FRIEDMANS CONFIRM THE BACON BI-LITERAL CIPHER.

[A Phoenix]

THE RIGOROUS METHODS EMPLOYED IN DEMONSTRATING THE PRESENCE OF

BACON'S BI-LITERAL CIPHER.

[A Phoenix]

THE PRESENCE OF THE BACON BI-LITERAL CIPHER IS DEMONSTRABLE BEYOND ANY DOUBT.

[A Phoenix]

JOHN W. KOPEC AND HIS BOOK THE SABINES AT RIVERBANK.

[A Phoenix]

JOHN W. KOPEC CURATOR OF RIVERBANK MUSEUM.

[A Phoenix]

JOHN W. KOPEC AND THE RECORDS OF RIVERBANK'S SECRET, HIDDEN, OBSCURED PAST.

[Light-of-Truth]

Mr. Kopec died on October 14, Day 288 (287 in non-leap year days) in 2004. He passed the Pillars into his New Atlantis on a Baconian day. Too bad for us. It would have been great to have him here for a discussion or two!

 

[A Phoenix]

SECRET INSIDE INFORMATION ABOUT THE FRIEDMANS AT RIVERBANK.

[A Phoenix]

THE EXPLOSIVE TRUTH ABOUT THE ANONYMOUS AUTHORSHIP OF

THE GREATEST WORK OF SIR FRANCIS BACON.