Jump to content

The Fraudulent Friedmans


Recommended Posts

6 hours ago, Allisnum2er said:

Hi Rob , the ciphers left by the Friedmans on page 101 (simple cipher of LIBER PATER) may cause you to change your mind ! 😀

I woke up with excitement that the Friedmans knew a cipher will end the authorship argument and say it as the last line of their book. The Strats celebrate that the Friedmans make it appear they destroy the Baconian cipher theories and hope that ends the discussion. But they are blind, and by choice.

It may be that a biliteral cipher will be the cipher that does it. That is one that would be considered "scientific" and any professional cryptologist could verify.

I believe way too much emphasis has been put on Bacon's example with two different font styles. It makes a beautiful example and it is a method he demonstrates, but the biliteral cipher could be anything binary. Bacon understood that. For example, I plan to try this key which I've had in mind a while:

image.png.5aa44d5486a0f7d22cefe45fcf41c151.png

We have anagrams, acrostics, number ciphers, telestich, visual clues in engravings and artwork, and a vast collection of other Baconian ciphers that tell the story of Bacon's life and some of those would pass the Friedman test based on examples they share of ciphers they acknowledge. If we find a repeatable biliteral cipher message, we nail it and it could "cease" the authorship debate.

EDIT: replaced the Key image as I had left out a letter!

Edited by Light-of-Truth
  • Like 3

T A A A A A A A A A A A T
157     www.Light-of-Truth.com     287
<-- 1 8 8 1 1
O 1 1 8 8 1 -->

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hi Rob,

As the Friedmans concealed a message using anagrams and acrostic in the end of the corresponding chapter of their book, if I were in your shoes I would take a look for a hidden message using biliteral cipher at the end of the corresponding section.

Eventually, I would also take a look at the pages 167 and 279 of their book, corresponding to the pages of the 1605 and 1623 editions of "The advancement of Learning" , in which the biliteral cipher is revealed by Francis Bacon.

Just an idea !

Edit :

I don't have the book but I just found its contents on the net, and it appears that the Conclusion is on page 279, corresponding to the page of the 1623 edition of "The advancement of Learning" in which the bilateral cipher is revealed😀 (Year of publication of the First Folio)

It can not be coincidence !

If a message was concealed by the Friedmans using the biliteral cipher, it must be in this page. 

Edited by Allisnum2er
  • Like 2

image.png.b8c74f56d5551c745119c268cf9d3db8.png

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hi Kate,

Sorry but I am not sure to understand what you mean by "the key for the Pythagorean Cipher that Bacon used".

The Pythagorean Cipher is mentionned in one volume of Baconiana, and is based on the 26 letter alphabet.

https://francisbaconsociety.co.uk/baconiana-journals/baconiana-journals-2007-present/baconiana-vol1-no5/

You have also the great essay by Richard Allan Wagner on Bacon's use of the 26 letter Alphabet :

https://sirbacon.org/Bacons Use of Gematria and the 26 Letter Alphabet.pdf

Regards.

  • Like 1
  • Thanks 1

image.png.b8c74f56d5551c745119c268cf9d3db8.png

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, Allisnum2er said:

If a message was concealed by the Friedmans using the biliteral cipher, it must be in this page. 

I'll take a look. I tinkered around in the Sonnets a little this morning.

If they did leave a biliteral cipher, I'd expect they left a clue as to the key. And it would be doubtful to me it is a font style. 😉

Page 279 begins the CONCLUSION. Must be a B and A somewhere. We do see at the bottom:

   ...be a ...
...contest...

The plain text is all Stratfordian, for those Strats who might only read the first and last page of the Conclusion. LOL

image.png.47a7c7f61a5e0c7af9859e169156399d.png

 

  • Like 2

T A A A A A A A A A A A T
157     www.Light-of-Truth.com     287
<-- 1 8 8 1 1
O 1 1 8 8 1 -->

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hi Rob and Yann, I thought I would put up the pages covering the Great One's discussion of ciphers in his De Augmentis Scientiarum which begins on page 277 simple cipher for Francis Bacon (100)/William Shakespeare (177) in other words conveying the concealed cryptographic message that Francis Bacon is Shakespeare. The same message repeatedly conveyed by the Friedmans in The Shakespearean Ciphers Examined and on their tombstone!
 

277.png

  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

30 minutes ago, A Phoenix said:

Hi Rob and Yann, I thought I would put up the pages covering the Great One's discussion of ciphers in his De Augmentis Scientiarum which begins on page 277 simple cipher for Francis Bacon (100)/William Shakespeare (177) in other words conveying the concealed cryptographic message that Francis Bacon is Shakespeare. The same message repeatedly conveyed by the Friedmans in The Shakespearean Ciphers Examined and on their tombstone!

The Friedmans used the number AND they even taught about 100 and 177 together on page 169 in ODD NUMBERS:

image.png.9ab5252f71d008430484c4cb11ad757f.png

 

  • Like 3

T A A A A A A A A A A A T
157     www.Light-of-Truth.com     287
<-- 1 8 8 1 1
O 1 1 8 8 1 -->

Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 hours ago, A Phoenix said:

Hi Rob and Yann, I thought I would put up the pages covering the Great One's discussion of ciphers in his De Augmentis Scientiarum which begins on page 277 simple cipher for Francis Bacon (100)/William Shakespeare (177) in other words conveying the concealed cryptographic message that Francis Bacon is Shakespeare. The same message repeatedly conveyed by the Friedmans in The Shakespearean Ciphers Examined and on their tombstone!

Hi A Phoenix, the number 277 is also concealed in the Cover of their Book, as well as the number 287 ! 😊

Signature.png.717245fcea6e581f5a5f53e3870df211.png

I like the idea that the number 729 , the Kay cipher of "By William F. and Elizebeth S. Friedman" hides the number 279 we were talking about yesterday.

  • Wow! 3

image.png.b8c74f56d5551c745119c268cf9d3db8.png

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 hours ago, A Phoenix said:

Francis Bacon established the permanent foundations of what became British Intelligence (MI5 and MI6).

"Bacon, Francis Bacon."

"Bond, James Bond"

BACON and BOND are both 33 Simple cipher. 😉

 

 

  • Like 3

T A A A A A A A A A A A T
157     www.Light-of-Truth.com     287
<-- 1 8 8 1 1
O 1 1 8 8 1 -->

Link to comment
Share on other sites

BMT 216A

This morning I came across where Day 216 is on the first line after where Tier 13 goes to 14 in a 22 Tiered Pyramid. A synchronicity for me today.

2116.jpg.7318775a878d4079b3f1fd088e3234df.jpg

It is in a very nice place. I'm trying to write another post for tonight in a new topic, but this came up and is part of everything happening right now. At least in my tiny world! 😉

BMT 216A

B=2, M=12, T=19

211219

2=B, 1=A, 21=W, 9=I

BA W and I, or EYE? Or is I ONE? 9 is a magic number. 3x3=9.

You know me, I see BACON and WILLIAM I. But that's just me. 216 is something I may bring up in another topic. Bond, Bacon, are they interwoven? 😉

Fraudulent Friedmans, they were connected to the same British Intelligence that Bacon refined for the purpose of keeping secrets and secret hunting. They knew, as A. Phoenix revealed with high quality professionalism and style. The Friedmans' book (as I read random pages) is schizophrenic, dual personalities.  Like a Baconian on a Stratfordian radio show where they get almost equal time, yet the Strat makes the intro and conclusion! LOL

Remember the Friedman's were Master Cryptologitst, and also Master Liars. They were oo7 spies. For them to use deception at times was a way of life.

Strats for this deception and Joke accepted 100% without questioning or even seeing the actual messages in this crazy book that supports and encourage Baconians. How embarrassing this may become for Strats!

I am sad I was not around for them to bash. The attention would be great, an opportunity to share, and a World Hero Cryptologist reviewing my work! They'd bash me of course, as they do pretty much everybody in their book, but we who can see would take a look!

In marketing, "Bad publicity can be the most memorable, thus the most valuable."

But it has to be done just right. 😉

 

 

 

 

 

 

  • Like 2

T A A A A A A A A A A A T
157     www.Light-of-Truth.com     287
<-- 1 8 8 1 1
O 1 1 8 8 1 -->

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest Ryan Murtha
On 6/17/2022 at 10:19 AM, Lawrence Gerald said:
 
The questions remain on how a respected authority in his field of cipher would betray his own mind by refuting his prior  convictions that Shakespeare ciphers exist and keep it  hidden from the public record.  What motivated him to play his Jekyll to his Hyde? Would he and his publisher, Cambridge University, find greater revenue from book sales by supporting the false narrative of the Stratford myth? Does it come down to that? Money over  Conscience and Truth? How can it be possible for a man to play both sides of the coin, to publicly dismiss an idea while practicing that same idea into action? How can the same man once with a conscience who held the keys to quickening the end of a World War and it's evil perpetrators and  having endured sleepless nights,  long bouts of depression eventually sell out his reputation and  all that is Good? 
 

This is where we have to understand what we are up against. It is a whole worldview. Because Shakespeare has long been seen as a kind of secular scripture, the facts of Bacon's life refute that whole point of view. Born of a virgin, a born king (but not of this world, as it turned out - his library was dukedom enough), prosecuting his rebellious brother who tried to take the throne by force. These parallels with Jesus, and the parallels with the hero archetype outlined in Otto Rank's Myth of the Birth of the Hero and later popularized by Joseph Campbell, they tend to show the reality of God and the truth of Christianity. 

Edited by Ryan Murtha
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Francis Bacon's discussion of ciphers in his De Augmentis Scientiarum which begins on page 277 simple cipher for Francis Bacon (100)/William Shakespeare (177) in other words conveying the concealed cryptographic message that Francis Bacon is Shakespeare. The same message repeatedly conveyed by the Friedmans in The Shakespearean Ciphers Examined and on their tombstone!

FF10.png

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share

×
×
  • Create New...