Jump to content

Video about Bacon and his Rosicrucian Work


Kate

Recommended Posts

Thank you 

Thanks for your share on Twitter AP 

Please can you share on Facebook too 🙏

I think knowledge of astronomy/astrology makes a huge difference to the understanding of history and myth. Almost everything stems from the Sun and planetary movements and understanding of the Cardinal points, constellations  etc

We have become so used to looking at our watches or devices and turning the heating on and off, having food on tap etc but our early ancestors only had the sky to guide them.

I wonder how many people will watch this all the way through 😉

x

 

  • Like 3

 "For nothing is born without unity or without the point." amazon.com/dp/B0CLDKDPY8

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Great video Kate! You Will raise some eyebrows for sure. 🙂

Bravo!!

Awesome timing as well:

You put it up on 6-7-22, so 67 (FRANCIS) and 22 as you describe so well.

We were in the second day (2) of Sonnet 67 (Day 158 of the year).

Edited by Light-of-Truth
  • Like 2
  • Thanks 1

T A A A A A A A A A A A T
157     www.Light-of-Truth.com     287
<-- 1 8 8 1 1
O 1 1 8 8 1 -->

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

Hi Kate, on a number of levels the video is a masterclass. With some impressive aplomb you debunk some of those Oxfordian delusions regularly repeated by the unknowledgeable and uncritical. In the affirmative you impressively present a number of great original cryptographical discoveries (ciphers/anagrams) against your running theme of duality which traces back to the mystery schools that you explore in more detail in your great book The Secret Work (see my review of the book on B'Hive 13 February) all delivered in an engaging narrative. PS Thank you for your very kind and overwhelmingly generous praise of my own work on The Fraudulent Friedmans.  

  • Like 1
  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Absolutely my pleasure AP. You deserve far more views on your videos.

It’s only a few hours since I put it up but there’s only one ‘like’ out of 24 views. That bothers me as the one must be you! Usually the ratio is better than that! I’m wondering now if my instinct about my tone was right?
 

I’d welcome feedback from anyone who watches it. 
 

many thanks 

  • Thanks 1

 "For nothing is born without unity or without the point." amazon.com/dp/B0CLDKDPY8

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hey Kate!! Just watched the first one!! (Then had to feed our wild birds.)

I am so impressed! Fabulous! Wow! Your video is awesome! New nuggets of Gold for my mind! Wow!!

We are sharing the best company in the world with each other. Truth, and Love. Exactly as Bacon dreamed.

Excellent! You are a quickly rising Star in the Baconian world. Happy to know you!!

And, Happy Summer Solstice!!! 😉

I need to feed a cat, dog, do dishes, etc., then will watch number 2 in a while.

Nice job, Kate, I hope a lot of people see it. 🙂

EDIT: Kate, I took some notes when you nailed a few things. You might enjoy this and know exactly where it comes from:

WHAT IS THY NAME = 157 Simple cipher.

image.png.dc87df245068e1b7b4028f964e02882a.png

 

Edited by Light-of-Truth
  • Like 3

T A A A A A A A A A A A T
157     www.Light-of-Truth.com     287
<-- 1 8 8 1 1
O 1 1 8 8 1 -->

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, Light-of-Truth said:

BINGO, Yann!

Notice the Reverse and Short ciphers? 😉

I think the Truth is making progress. Time for the lies and deception to be put away for good. 🙂

 

Indeed, our dear WILLIAM TUDOR I  ! 😊 And I just realized that 58 is also the short cipher of ... SHAKESPEARE !

  • Like 2
  • Wow! 1

image.png.b8c74f56d5551c745119c268cf9d3db8.png

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Kate gave us two lines; 33 (BACON) and 34 (33+34 is 67, FRANCIS). FRANCIS BACON. Page 2, Column 2 of the Histories. Next line:

WHAT IS THY NAME = 157 Simple, 168 Reverse, and 58 Short the same as WILLIAM TUDOR I.

image.png.4803afb851f366b8afe484d25defce4b.png

New territory for me! Thank you, Kate!!

157 Simple and 287 Kaye will always be FRA ROSIE CROSS for all Baconians. But is also Bacon's "real" name, for we who have accepted it.

WILLIAM TUDOR I.

Sometimes the clues refer to the RC, other times to his name.

image.png.5ebd2461224fc6a5be856028bc765ab5.png

Here it absolutely refers to Bacon's name, "What is thy name?" Who IS Francis Bacon?

When the Friedmans hints at "i's" and t's", I feel like we need to see where they mention "w's". 😉

 

  • Like 3

T A A A A A A A A A A A T
157     www.Light-of-Truth.com     287
<-- 1 8 8 1 1
O 1 1 8 8 1 -->

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 hours ago, Light-of-Truth said:

It'll be later today or this evening when I watch them and I am looking forward to it! 🙂

Yea, quoting myself. I thought there were TWO videos, but it appears there is ONE which is Part 2. I watched Part 1 a while back and Part 2 this afternoon.

🙂

My head is still going over things you mentioned! The Triple Tau right now. Is 111 possibly three Pillars, or The Triple Tau?

  • Like 3

T A A A A A A A A A A A T
157     www.Light-of-Truth.com     287
<-- 1 8 8 1 1
O 1 1 8 8 1 -->

Link to comment
Share on other sites

☺️ Thank you all so much for your very kind words. You’re very kind.

How did I miss What is thy name!? Amazing! 

In the interests of fairness I just had a message from an Oxfordian pointing out that at the time the old style calendar was in use, with NY’s day in March, and therefore the Westminster monument was erected in 1740. This person doesn’t dispute much of the info about FB but is fairly convinced that De Vere was somehow involved.
 

On balance, I think my pointing out - challenging, debunking, whatever - what I see as discrepancies in their narrative only fuels the divide. It may be better to work from the premise he was somehow involved and then let the weight of evidence and knowledge about FB rise so overwhelmingly that they have to concede (not that it’s a battle or game to be won, but you get my drift). 

Thanks again

  • Like 3

 "For nothing is born without unity or without the point." amazon.com/dp/B0CLDKDPY8

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, Kate said:

On balance, I think my pointing out - challenging, debunking, whatever - what I see as discrepancies in their narrative only fuels the divide. It may be better to work from the premise he was somehow involved and then let the weight of evidence and knowledge about FB rise so overwhelmingly that they have to concede (not that it’s a battle or game to be won, but you get my drift).

Do you think DeVere was "somehow" involved? Will any of them ever "concede"? Have we ever "won" over a Strat?

Personally, the selfish gassy guy has no place in my work, not worth the distraction from the Truth. Too many distractions already.

But that's just me. 😉

 

  • Like 1

T A A A A A A A A A A A T
157     www.Light-of-Truth.com     287
<-- 1 8 8 1 1
O 1 1 8 8 1 -->

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 hours ago, Kate said:

In the interests of fairness I just had a message from an Oxfordian pointing out that at the time the old style calendar was in use, with NY’s day in March, and therefore the Westminster monument was erected in 1740.

The calendar issue is of importance to me in relation to the Sonnets Pyramid design, of course. They way I work with it it begins on January 1st, but there are other ways to arrange the Sonnets that I have played with.

Most of Europe by 1609 had adopted January 1st as the New Year, but not England. However, John Dee came up with a calendar he proposed to Elizabeth in 1583 based on a 33 year cycle so that the Spring Equinox would always be on March 21st.

In the Sonnet Pyramid design, Sonnet 33 ends at midnight March 19th. Sonnet 34 contains all of March 20 and 21, and a couple lines of March 22.

http://www.light-of-truth.com/pyramid-GMT.php#Sonnet034

33 Sonnets and then the Equinox. Perhaps Bacon's Pyramid design using the Tables Dee gave him ("TThy guift, thy tables" to begin Day 287) is somehow connected to Dee's 33 year calendar.

The last line of March 21 with modern text is, "To him that bears the strong offence's cross." That is a perfect reference to the Equinox. The original spelling is different, "To him that beares the strong offenses losse." It should be "crosse", so is this a typo that is meant to be noticed? Who changed it, and when was it changed to "cross"?

I may expand on this later. 🙂

 

  • Like 1
  • Wow! 1

T A A A A A A A A A A A T
157     www.Light-of-Truth.com     287
<-- 1 8 8 1 1
O 1 1 8 8 1 -->

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hi Grand Master Kate,

I have just watched your video which you presented with impressive modesty and aplomb. As I said in a previous B'Hive post I am fully persuaded that the anagram was definitely intentional and meant to cryptically convey that Lord Bacon is Shakespeare. As far as I know this is a world first and should be credited to you as such. Congratulations. Brilliant work. ♥️👍🙂

  • Like 2
  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...