Jump to content

Allisnum2er

Members
  • Posts

    1,824
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    49

Everything posted by Allisnum2er

  1. Hi Rob, Thank you for sharing. ❀️ I can imagine the smile on your face when you discovered the two triangles and their link with your "ShaKAshA".😊 Interestingly, there are also 144 letters from "TO THE ONLIE BEGETTER ..." to "FORTH" (144 = SIR FRANCIS BACON) And there are 174 characters, by taking in count the 28 periods and two hyphens. (174 = FRANCIS BACON TUDOR) There are 100 characters form "TO" to "BY." and 74 characters from "OUR" to "FORTH."
  2. In passing, I would like to come back to something I shared with you by the past about a deliberate mistake made by Ben Jonson on page 102 of Discoveries. https://archive.org/details/workesofbenjamin00jons/page/n653/mode/2up Indeed, on page 102 of Timber, or Discoveries Made upon Men and Matter, tells us about Francis Bacon I have ever observ'd it, to have beene the office of a wise Patriot, among the greatest affaires of the State, to take care of the Common-wealth of Learning ... ... This made the late Lord S. Albane, entitle his worke, novum oraganum. Which though by the most of superficiall men ; who cannot get beyond the Title of Nominals, it is not penetrated, nor understood : it really openeth all defects of Learning, whatsoever ; and is a Booke. Qui longum noto scriptori porriget Γ¦vum. Ben Jonson quotes Horatio (De Arte Poetica), but he makes an obvious mistake. Indeed, he uses the latin word "porriget" instead of "prorogat" Qui longum noto scriptori prorogat Γ¦vum. "PORRIGET" comes from the verb "PORRIGO" meaning TO EXTEND in the sense of " TO STRETCH". "PROROGAT" comes from the verb "PROROGO" meaning TO EXTEND but in the sense of "TO PROLONG". This is all the more surprising in that Ben Jonson's translation of De Arte Poetica, with the original Latin text , can be found in this Second Folio, and we can read : Et longum noto scriptori prorogat Γ¦vum. Interestingly, PORRIGET = 103 = SHAKESPEARE and PROROGAT = 104 = PALLAS ATHENA But beyond these mathematical considerations, I think that Ben Jonson could in fact make reference to The Merchant of Venice Act 3 scene 2, page 173. (173 # R(17) C(3) for Rosy Cross) https://internetshakespeare.uvic.ca/Library/facsimile/book/SLNSW_F1/191/index.html%3Fzoom=850.html Qui longum noto scriptori porriget/prorogat Γ¦vum This "mistake" could be a way to refere both to Novum Organum and the First Folio.
  3. The Alchemical Quest As mentioned by Rob (Light-of-Truth) at the very beginning of this Quest ... THE ALCHEMICAL QUEST = 174 (Simple cipher) = 100 ( FRANCIS BACON) + 74 (WILLIAM/TUDOR/MEDIOCRIA) For this 174th post, let's take a look at page 174 of The First Folio 😊 ... https://internetshakespeare.uvic.ca/Library/facsimile/book/SLNSW_F1/192/index.html%3Fzoom=850.html The Act 3 scene 2 relates to the Casket test with the three caskets of gold, silver and lead, Bassanio being the third and last suitor after the Prince of Morocco and the Prince of Aragon. The Prince of Morocco chooses the gold one ; The Prince of Aragon chooses the silver one ; L. Bassanio (Bacon) chooses the one made of lead. 3 suitors - 3 chests -> 33 = BACON (Simple cipher) See the great analysis by A Phoenix (pages 20-23): https://www.academia.edu/60448246/Francis_Bacon_Bassanio_Bellario_and_Anthony_Bacon_the_titular_character_Antonio_and_The_Merchant_of_Venice And here are some ideas ... The following passage contains 33 words (33=BACON) And the values of the Capital letters add to 33. B(2) + C(3) + H(8) + O(14) + D(4) + B(2) = 33 = BACON BACON - HOD HOD is the Hebrew word for SPLENDOR/MAJESTY/GLORY The reference to the "Swan-like end, fading in musique" reminded me the first Elegy in "Manes Verulamiani" ... LIGHT - Alpha (A) Omega (W) Notice that with the "So" in the bottom left we can also make the word "SoW". "Son of Wisdom"
  4. Hi A Phoenix, I would like to share with you something that I noticed yesterday in the course of my research in a Book published in 1615 mentioning William Shakespeare, the actor. It can be nothing more than coincidences but it is interesting. πŸ™‚ https://www.google.fr/books/edition/Foedera_Conventiones_Literae_Et_Cujuscun/jJ9SAAAAcAAJ?hl=fr&gbpv=1 On page 505 ... I like the fact that there are 33 words from "Greetinge" to "Shakespeare" and 33 words from "Shakespeare" to "Comedies, Tragedies, Histories ..." https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lawrence_Fletcher And right in the following page, in the next passage written in English talking about the reunion of the two realms of England and Scotland, "The middle" is mentionned. P.S: There are two passages in the Book about Francis Bacon and his Brother Anthony, but written in Latin.
  5. The Alchemical Quest Back to the Alchemical Quest, the "t" of "the Elixir" of which the simple cipher is 19 also leads us to the page 19 of the First Folio that is the last page of the The Tempest, that is the "Last" play written by Bacon for the First Folio and the "First" play of the Folio. It gives me the occasion to share here the fruit of my research on this page. https://internetshakespeare.uvic.ca/Library/facsimile/book/SLNSW_F1/37/index.html%3Fzoom=850.html FIRST&LAST.mp4 Notice that in my last slide I have finally exchanged the places of "Adrian, Francisco, Lords" and "Alonso, K. of Naples" because it makes sense to have ""Adrian, Francisco, Lords" in the bloc with Francis hidden in acrostic.
  6. BACON'S WIT You know my thoughts on the importance of BACON'S WIT in the First Folio. I already shared some examples of BACON-WIT that seems to have been concealed in acrostic, the very first one being, in my view, in Ben Jonson's Poem "To the Reader". And it seems to be confirmed by another BACON-WIT on page 33 of the First Folio ... Notice, that "On silly women," could have been printed right after "do no outrages" and that the "o" of "or" would have provided the Capital letter "O" of BACON instead of the one of "On". The choice to start a new line after "do no outrage" could be to signal a clean break right after the 33 word, another subterfuge to conceal BACON (33 simple cipher) and F. BACON (39 simple cipher). And for me, 74 is the simple cipher of WILLIAM/TUDOR/MEDIOCRIA I also remind you , the BACON-WIT found on page 149. https://internetshakespeare.uvic.ca/Library/facsimile/book/Bran_F1/167/index.html%3fzoom=1200.html Fun fact ... This page 149 is the 167th page of the First Folio. 167 is the simple cipher of FRANCIS BACON'S WIT 149 is the simple cipher of FRANCIS BACON - WIT Moreover, WIT can be seen as the anagram of WTI that, based on the work of Rob (Light-of-Truth) could be the anagram of WILLIAM TUDOR I (his Royal Name). This being said, why do I say that ? Today, I read a known quote by Francis Bacon with fresh eyes. "For myself…I may truly say that both in this present work, and in those I intended to publish hereafter, I often advisedly and deliberately throw aside the dignity of my name and wit (if such a thing be) in my endeavour to advance human interests." [Francis Bacon, De Augmentis Scientiarum, 1623; Spedding, Works, V, p. 4] It sounds crazy, but what if it must be understood in the literal sense as welle as the figurative ? Could his "name and wit" hidden in acrostic could be considered as to have been thrown aside ? With this idea in mind, I wondered if "throw aside" appeared in the First Folio. The answer is ... YES, almost ... in Richard II Act I Scene I ! πŸ™‚ Initially, I believed that NoCA(BIT)ACoN (Janus-like) was hidden in acrostic with BIT standing for the transliteration of the Hebrew letter Beith (Beth-Yod-Tav). I keep this as an interesting possibility, but I also see the possibility to make the word WIT . In passing, all this is already present in the first Quarto published in 1597. https://internetshakespeare.uvic.ca/Library/facsimile/edition/Q1_R2/r2/index.html
  7. I like when you think out loud ! 😊 I had evidently the 23 April, and Shakespeare in mind, facing this reference to Sir Francis Bacon in a book about St George, Saint and Soldier of Christ Iesus. πŸ™‚ I would say that, indeed "count(e)" can be seen as an invitation to count. I do not think that you need to use the co of "count" to obtain 103. C3 do the job for us depending on wether we consider that C=3 (Simple cipher) or C = 100 (Roman numerals). I would add that the sum of the numbers in brackets is 67 = FRANCIS In passing, I have just noticed that this is the second edition of the Book. I will try to find a copy of the first edition. EDIT : https://quod.lib.umich.edu/e/eebo/A03144.0001.001/1:7?rgn=div1;view=fulltext There are some differences between the first and the second Edition : "THat excellent though unfortunate Sir FRANCIS BACON, created afterwards Lord Verulam, and Viscount St. Albons; in his religious Essayes, thus informes us." The 3rd point in the first Edition that is about " The three ages of the Church in this later Time" is not found in the 2nd Edition. Contrariwise, the 10th point of the 2nd Edition "What may be alleaged in defence thereof" is not found in the first Edition. "The first Author of Scholasticall or fabulous Historie" becomes "the first Founder of the Legendary or fabulous Histories".
  8. Hi A Phoenix, I have just discovered the following book published in 1633 about ... St George. https://www.google.fr/books/edition/The_Historie_of_that_Most_Famous_Saint_a/00JMAAAAcAAJ?hl=fr&gbpv=1 Bacon is mentioned in the first Chapter, in the first point talking about the 3 kinds of Imposture, right before a second point talking about "The first Founder of the Legendary or fabulous Histories". 😊 Coincidently, St George with his Spear is mentioned on page 74. (The spear of Longinus is mentioned on page 55)
  9. Alexa must know this French Book published in 1686, talking about "The English Poets" 😊 https://www.google.fr/books/edition/Jugemens_des_scavans_sur_les_principaux/Pp5aXyguiogC?hl=fr&gbpv=1
  10. Hi A Phoenix, For our greatest happiness, and to Stratfordians' dismay, you are unexhaustible. 😊 A big WOW that stands for "Wonderful, Outstanding Works"! ❀️ Excellent Research and Presentation, great Videos and great synopsis ! I will take the time to read your academic paper in the next few days. In passing, I love your choice of music for the Trailer with the ticking clock reminding us that : "TIME BRINGS FORTH THE HIDDEN TRUTH" Congrats
  11. Hi Rob, Ryan Plaster and Guitaoist are two different persons and Lawrence already shared a video by Guitaoist about Don Quixote by the past. Hi Marvin, By claiming that Shake-speare the Author was not Shakspere the Actor, WE are "conspiracy theorists" in the eyes of the Stratfordians and even in the eyes of Baconians that do not think that Bacon was Shakespeare .
  12. Hi everyone, The two slides related with "Rosie Cross" in Cymbeline that I shared earlier in another Topic had been planned for "The Alchemical Quest", following the post I made last week. Here are all the slides that resume my point of view regarding this passage. https://internetshakespeare.uvic.ca/Library/facsimile/book/SLNSW_F1/887/?zoom=850 For me, all is said in this passage, in which Petter Amundsen found few years ago Rosie Cross concealed in a 3,4,5 triangle. We have "halfe-way" hidden right above "That most venerable man, which I did call my Father". In my view, Bacon makes a reference to his Foster Father Nicholas Bacon, whom the motto was "mediocria firma" (Midway is safe) He tells us that he is a "Bastard" and : "my Mother seem'd the Dian of that time". Queen Elizabeth Tudor, the Virgin Queen, was seem'd the Dian of that time. https://www.selection.ca/arts-et-culture/21-photos-et-peintures-des-chiens-de-la-famille-royale-a-travers-lhistoire/ In the middle (mediocria), the values of the capital letters add to 62 or F.B. (F= 6 and B=2) And they deliver a message : I , SOW (SOW is the acronym of Son Of Wisdom or Son Of Widow) Be sure that facing the "halfe-way" I wondered if beyond "I, SOW", the remaining (lowercase) letters concealed a message or not. Here is what I found ... Notice that in the center, "so doth" provides us the letters S,O,D, SOD being the hebrew word for SECRET. And in the middle, I found the word "pomme" that is the french word for "apple", and the letters e,r,s,o allowing to make the words EROS (CUPID, Bastard Son of Venus) SORE and ROSE. The words "pomme" and "rose" in the context of a passage in which Bacon seemed to reveal he was the son of Queen Elizabeth immediatly reminded me another one of my discoveries ... And SORE, the another anagram of EROS and ROSE can be linked to the Pregnancy Portrait of Elizabeth I. See the great work of A Phoenix on the subject : https://www.academia.edu/45006558/The_Pregnancy_Portrait_of_Queen_Elizabeth_I_and_The_Secret_Royal_Birth_of_Francis_Bacon_Concealed_Author_of_the_Shakespeare_Works
  13. It is difficult to talk about the content of books that I did not read. Like you, I had occasionally listening to the videos from Jake Roberts, and I watched the last one. All I can say is that, based on my own research, I do not think that Francis Bacon was the secret son of Mary, Queen of Scots, and Francis King of France. And here are two slides that resume my point of view regarding the" Key of the Rosie Cross". https://internetshakespeare.uvic.ca/Library/facsimile/book/SLNSW_F1/887/?zoom=850 For me, all is said in this passage, in which Petter Amundsen found few years ago Rosie Cross concealed in a 3,4,5 triangle. We have "halfe-way" hidden right above "That most venerable man, which I did call my Father". In my view, Bacon makes a reference to his Foster Father Nicholas Bacon, whom the motto was "mediocria firma" (Midway is safe) He tells us that he is a "Bastard" and : "my Mother seem'd the Dian of that time". Was Mary Queen of Scots seen as the Chaste Dian of her time ??? No ! But Queen Elizabeth Tudor, the Virgin Queen, was ! https://www.selection.ca/arts-et-culture/21-photos-et-peintures-des-chiens-de-la-famille-royale-a-travers-lhistoire/ In the middle (mediocria),the values of the capital letters add to 62 or F.B. (F= 6 and B=2) And they deliver a message : I , SOW (SOW is the acronym of Son Of Wisdom or Son Of Widow)
  14. Hi A Phoenix, Sorry, but being wholly absorbed in "Hocus Pocus Junior" I did not take the time to thank you for sharing your great analysis of The Ultra Secret . I saw two or three more things that I will share with you but today time is short. Just one thing regarding this first page and the last one ... Funny coincidence, if we count KBE as one, the 33rd word is "who" and 33 = BACON And as good things come in threes there are two other "who". If we count "II" as two, as you suggest, then the second "who" is the 63rd word and the third "who" is the 81st word. And 33 + 63 + 81 = 33 + 144 = BACON + SIR FRANCIS BACON = 177 WHO ? BACON - SIR FRANCIS BACON - WILLIAM SHAKE-SPEARE ? We can't know if it was intended or a mere flight of fancy, but it fits well. And notice that the last page mentions the Battle of ... MIDWAY ! πŸ™‚ Kind regards
  15. A quick update regarding my last post. I am really sorry, but I made a mistake. I was studying the last page of the 4th edition of the Book,talking about name not bound to tell, and noticed that the last paragraph was 33rd lines long, with 148 words on the last page ( without taking the title in count and by counting FINISH as one word). It could have been a way to conceal BACON(33) and WILLIAM TUDOR (148). Taking a look at the 2nd edition, I realized that the last paragraph was 34 lines long with 180 words on the last page. Because the 2nd edition (1635) and the fourth edition (1654) of Hocus Pocus Junior had the same number of pages, I assumed that their pagination was identical ... This is not the case 😞! The message that seems to be concealed in the 4th edition (1654) is not found in the second edition (1635). Notice that the text was shortened between the 2nd and the fourth edition. "A litlle hole in the crowne of it as F" is not found in the 4th edition. Was all this intended by a 92 years old Bacon in order to be able to conceal the message that I found in the middle ? https://www.loc.gov/resource/rbc0001.2008houdini10760/?sp=43&st=image&r=-0.176,0.503,1.328,0.677,0 I will have to take a look at the third edition.
  16. The Alchemical Quest Magic is my first passion from my teenaged years. My father teached me my first card tricks when I was 12 or 13 years old. For fun, here is the only video about "magic" I posted on youtube, a card trick I created many years ago.😊 Back to my actual passion, Francis Bacon. Yesterday, my research led me (thanks to a post by A Phoenix) to a book of magic published in 1634 : https://www.google.fr/books/edition/Hocus_Pocus_Junior_The_Anatomie_of_Leger/e-pmAAAAcAAJ?hl=fr&gbpv=1 This morning, I wondered if a message could be concealed in the middle of the Chapter about Bonus Genius, on the 33rd page of Hocus Pocus Junior (2nd Edition) published in 1635. The first word that I saw was "old" echoing the word "Senior" (Principle of Repetition). From there, I followed the middle line (Mediocria firma) and I found 'bacon'. If it is not "just an illusion" and that this message was intended, it would be a new proof that Francis Bacon feigned his death in 1623, a proof that he was still alive in 1634 and that he was involved in the edition of this Book.
  17. Hi Kate, This is a big "IF", but "IF" Francis Bacon was involved in the choice of the Arms granted to John Shakespere in 1596, his choice could have been made deliberately, based on his knowledge of these different links( De Mauley Family , Marlowe, and Cervantes/Aragon/Catalonia). I talked to you, yesterday, about the Coat-of-Arms of Edmund De Mauley with Snakes or Wyverns (Dragons). http://seatonross.org.uk/wp-content/uploads/2017/11/Sir-Edmund-de-Mauley-Knight-and-Lord-of-the-Manor-Seton-1306.pdf There is something that I forgot to mention, a link in one of Shakespeare's play, between Dragons , Merlin and Don Quixote. https://internetshakespeare.uvic.ca/Library/facsimile/book/SLNSW_F1/381/index.html%3Fzoom=850.html https://archive.org/details/bim_eighteenth-century_don-quixote-english-_cervantes-saavedra-migu_1725_4/page/20/mode/2up?q=Garlick I let you explore the pages talking about Garlick and Cheese. πŸ™‚
  18. Few days ago, Kate shared on another topic one page that is a facsimile of the 1605 Edition of The Advancement of Learning dedicated to cyphers. Having studied this page few weeks ago, I noticed an error that makes an interesting difference. 😊 Indeed, the word "or" is missing. https://archive.org/details/workesofbenjamin00jons/page/208/mode/2up Thus, there is a total of 177 words instead of 178. And we are in a passage dedicated to "cyphars" and talking about "Simple-cyphars" and "Kay-cyphars". Interestingly, 177 is the simple cipher of WILLIAM SHAKESPEARE. 178 is the Kay cipher of WILL TUDOR. Notice that the passage dedicated to the biliteral cipher contains 33 words (33 = BACON) and that from "kindes" to "suspition" there are 67 words (67 = FRANCIS). Notice also that there is the capital T of "The" in italic. Why ? Here is an idea. It could be a way to indicate a second count. "whatsoever" is the 100th word (FRANCIS BACON simple cipher) by counting from "kindes" and by considering "WHEELE-CYPHARS" and "KAY-CYPHARS" as two words. But if we count from "The" and if we consider that "WHEELE CYPHARS" and "KAY CYPHARS" count for 4 words, then "whatsoever" is the 103rd word (SHAKESPEARE). This idea seems to be confirmed by the fact that there are 33 words from "The" to "&c." (first sentence)with this count. Then, I wondered if a message could have been concealed in the middle. Interestingly, if "whatsoever" is the 100th word by counting from "kindes"(the beginning of the page in the original edition), the 33rd word is "vertues", the two words being almost in the middle axis. I decided to take a closer look between these two words ... Once again, is it nothing more than a coincidence and the fruit of my imagination, or was it intended ? I don't know ! But I see the word spear by taking one letter every second line. And which name appears between the lines ? W. TUDOR (which is undoubtly possible ! πŸ˜„) Fun fact : TUDOR appears by using the "tu" of "vertues", the 33rd word (BACON), the "o" of "suspition", the 67th word (FRANCIS), the "d" and "r" of "and read" that are the 51st and 52nd words . 51 + 52 = 103 = SHAKESPEARE.
  19. Hi Kate, Very interesting topic and research. Now, like you say about ciphers and acronyms, "one has to be careful not to try and make things fit, but it’s fun trying". πŸ˜„ If Ros Barber or Bastien Conrad were among us they will probably talk to you about the Marlowe-Shakespeare Connection. https://marlowe-shakespeare.blogspot.com/2015/04/the-similarity-between-marlowe-and.html And to give more food for thoughts, here is an idea that I had few years ago. We know that both Francis Bacon and William Shakespeare "inherited" their Coat-of-Arms from their father. I like the idea that the Blason of Shakespeare could be linked to the De Mauley family, more precisely, the one of Edmund De Mauley with snakes or Dragons. https://www.theheraldrysociety.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/10/Clemmensen-paper.pdf Thus, there would be the spear on one side and the dragons on the other side, and it could hide a reference to St George and the dragon. Regarding the Coat-of-Arms of Nicholas Bacon, it is said that when he "attained the position of Lord Keeper of the Great Seal and a knighthood, the College of Heralds, about 1568, supplied him not only with a coat of arms but a retroactive pedigree extending back to Normandy". https://www.wikitree.com/wiki/Bacon-370 This "pedigree extending back to Normandy" is a reference to the De Molay-Bacon Branch, and it explains the "two molets" on the coat-of-arms. This is a pun, in French for " deux molet(te)s i.e De Molay. Thus we would have the Coat of Arms of John Shakspere/ William Shakespeare related with the one of " De Mauley ", and the Coat-of-Arms of Nicholas Bacon / Francis Bacon related with the one of " De Molay ". Indeed, it's fun ! πŸ™‚
  20. HOCUS PORCUS would have been too obvious and HOCUS POCUS = 133 πŸ˜„ I'm just kidding ! The whole title contains 53 words (Or 40 + 13 πŸ™‚ ). https://internetshakespeare.uvic.ca/Library/facsimile/book/SLNSW_F1/373/?zoom=1631 This is just an idea, on the fly, facing your question ! πŸ™‚
  21. Hi A Phoenix, I hope that you are well. Once again, thank you for all the hard work ! You really are tireless !πŸ˜… And I am sorry to go back in your narration but I have just found something which, I think, will interest you. 😊 I did not know what "legerdemain" meant in French. And in the course of my research, I have just found this book published in 1634. Hocus Pocus Junior. The Anatomie of Legerdemain, or the art of jugling . 1st Edition (1634) - 52 pages https://archive.org/details/bim_early-english-books-1475-1640_hocus-pocus-junior-the-_hocus-pocus_1634 2nd Edition (1635) - 62 pages https://www.loc.gov/resource/rbc0001.2008houdini10760/?sp=11 4th Edition (1654) - 62 pages https://www.google.fr/books/edition/Hocus_Pocus_Junior_The_Anatomie_of_Leger/e-pmAAAAcAAJ?hl=fr&gbpv=0 The fact that the 4th edition was sold by one Thomas Vere could work against us but "the truth is elsewhere". 😁 I will use the fourth edition that is identical to the 2nd edition because I don't know if I can use the photographs of the Library of Congress. There are four major differences between the first and the second edition. 1) the number of pages : 62 ( F.B.) in the Second (TWO) edition. 2) The printer Mark in the second Edition depicts kind of a Marionnetist or Ventriloquist. HICCIUS DOCTIUS means "this is a learned man". https://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/hiccius_doctius 3) The pages are not nunmbered but by counting from this Title-page, the explanation of "Hiccius Doctius" is given on the 33rd and 34th pages. 33 = BACON (simple cipher) 33 + 34 = 67 = FRANCIS (simple cipher) Nuntium invisibilis means "invisible messenger". 4) And the cherry on the cake is on the 50th page ... "A device how to multiply one face, and make it seem to be a hundred or a thousand" (100 = FRANCIS BACON simple cipher) The face on the left looks familiar. πŸ˜„ And on the right we have not hundred faces but ... 39 ! ( F. BACON simple cipher) Have a nice day.
  22. As well as "HOUSE OF BRICKS" πŸ˜‰ 😁
  23. It is clever. πŸ™‚ If I am right, there are 31 "VV" and 2 "W" for a total of 33 = BACON And you judiciously chose to keep the standard "w" for the 24th and the 31th ones. 24 + 31 = 55 = VV
  24. My quest began seven years ago thanks to Oracle Cards that inspired me a story. The writing of this story led me to the First Folio and this is how I learned about the SAQ. I essentially watched videos from Baconians and Oxfordians and some videos from Marlowians. Facing the difficulty to read books on the subject in English, I quicky decided to follow my own way and to see where it would lead me. When I began to flip through the pages of The Tempest, two pages immediatly caught my attention. I noticed that on the right column of page 7, and on page 11 , many letters W had been replaced by VV. It was clearly intended and it should mean something. I was hooked ! πŸ˜„ Regarding the page 7, as there was not one "vv" on the left column, it occured to me that the secret should lie in the number of the lines, by counting from the beginning of the right column. The count led me to number 444. At that time, I learned that 444 was the gematria of HaMikdash (The Temple). And for me it was interesting because it could be linked to Shakespeare Monument at Westminster Abbey with Shakespeare pointing to the word "Temples". https://sirbacon.org/gallery/west.htm Then, I envisaged that 444 could indicate a page or a leaf. This is the reason why I began to analyse page 444 and pages 887/888 (444th leaf). And this is how I realized that the "ROSIE CROSS" found by Petter Amundsen was at the 444th leaf. Was it a hidden reference to the Temple of the Rosie Cross ? Thanks to Rob, I learned that 444 = 157 + 287 157 and 287 being the simple cipher and the Kay cipher of ... FRA. ROSI CROSSE Few months ago, I noticed that this passage concealed more secrets ... W. TUDOR And today, for the first time in seven years, I came back to the page 7 of The Tempest to make this post. All was there, right before my eyes 😲 ... https://internetshakespeare.uvic.ca/Library/facsimile/book/SLNSW_F1/25/index.html%3fzoom=1275.html Regarding F. Bacon and the Commonwealth, I shall live the final word to Ben Jonson. Lord Bacon's Birth-day, Hail, happy Genius of this ancient pile ! How comes it all things so about thee smile ? The fire, the wine, the men ! and in the midst Thou stand'st as if some mystery thou didst ! Pardon, I read it in thy face, the day For whose returns, and many, all these pray ; And so do I. This is the sixtieth year, Since Bacon, and thy lord was born, and here ; Son to the grave wise Keeper of the Seal, Fame and foundation of the English weal. What then his father was, that since is he, Now with a title more to the degree ; England's high Chancellor : the destin'd heir, In his soft cradle, to his father's chair : Whose even thread the fates spin round and full, Out of their choicest and their whitest wool. 'Tis a brave cause of joy, let it be known, For 'twere a narrow gladness, kept thine own. Give me a deep-crown'd bowl, that I may sing In raising him, the wisdom of my king. https://archive.org/details/workesofbenjamin00jons/page/n653/mode/2up EDIT : For those who don't have watch my videos on the subject (Lord Bacon's Birth-day) ... There are 3 words in italic in Ben Jonson's Poem: Genius, Bacon and Englands These three words form the following sentence : Bacon, England's Genius The fact is that by counting from "Lord Bacon's ..." : Genius is the 6th word Bacon is the 65th word Englands is the 106th word 6 + 65 + 106 = 177 Moreover, BACON = 33 (Simple cipher) GENIUS = ENGLANDS = 72 (Simple cipher) 33 + 72 + 72 = 177 Thus, BACON, ENGLAND'S GENIUS = 177 = WILLIAM SHAKESPEARE
  25. The B'Hive is indestructible. The B'Hive is the House of Bricks ! πŸ˜‰
×
×
  • Create New...