Leaderboard

Greetings High Wizard of B'Hive, As always you bring into Baconian light things that have remained concealed and hidden from everyone else's eyes for centuries and in perpetuity your name will be for ever aligned with the name of the Great One.♥️♥️♥️

Nicholas Stone & Inigo Jones #FrancisBacon #Shakespeare #Rosicrucians #Freemasonry #KingJames #Buckingham Paper: https://www.academia.edu/51468107/Did_Francis_Bacon_die_in_1626_Or_did_he_Feign_his_Death_with_the_Help_of_his_Rosicrucian_Freemasonry_Brotherhood Video: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lTnZDpMy8uM&t=217s

Thomas Meautys #FrancisBacon #Shakespeare #Rosicrucians #Freemasonry #KingJames #Buckingham Paper: https://www.academia.edu/51468107/Did_Francis_Bacon_die_in_1626_Or_did_he_Feign_his_Death_with_the_Help_of_his_Rosicrucian_Freemasonry_Brotherhood Video: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lTnZDpMy8uM&t=217s

Archbishop Tenison #FrancisBacon #Shakespeare #Rosicrucians #Freemasonry #KingJames #Buckingham Paper: https://www.academia.edu/51468107/Did_Francis_Bacon_die_in_1626_Or_did_he_Feign_his_Death_with_the_Help_of_his_Rosicrucian_Freemasonry_Brotherhood Video: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lTnZDpMy8uM&t=217s

The Inscription #FrancisBacon #Shakespeare #Rosicrucians #Freemasonry #KingJames #Buckingham Paper: https://www.academia.edu/51468107/Did_Francis_Bacon_die_in_1626_Or_did_he_Feign_his_Death_with_the_Help_of_his_Rosicrucian_Freemasonry_Brotherhood Video: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lTnZDpMy8uM&t=217s

Royal Birth For four hundred years this rare Life of Bacon has been systematically suppressed by his orthodox editors and biographers for reasons that are about to become only all too clear. What is it then about the earliest Life of Bacon (aside from the ignorance of ordinary biographers and commentators) that has apparently motivated his major editors and biographers to effectively suppress certain lines and passages within it for the last four hundred years? Why on earth, and for what reason, would they go to such lengths to obscure and conceal them? What were they trying to hide and withhold from the rest of the world for nearly half a millennium? Answer: the first secret of Bacon’s life, the secret of his royal birth. For the literal and superficial It begins with a reference to his father being the Lord Keeper before intermingling striking and unmistakable allusions, to his secret royal birth, born of the very regal and royal monarch, Queen Elizabeth. #ElizabethI #VirginQueen #RobertDudley #FrancisBacon #RobertDevereux #PregnancyPortrait #HamptonCourt #RoyStrong #FrancisCarr Paper https://www.academia.edu/45006558/The_Pregnancy_Portrait_of_Queen_Elizabeth_I_and_The_Secret_Royal_Birth_of_Francis_Bacon_Concealed_Author_of_the_Shakespeare_Works Part 1 https://youtu.be/AFSxRYGxgjk Part 2 https://youtu.be/HWpuy13KHiA

Pierre Amboise's Life of Bacon The first English Life of Bacon by Dr Rawley pointed to his royal birth and the first Life of Bacon published in French repeatedly confirmed it. The ‘Discovrs Svr La Vie De Mre Francois Bacon, Chancelier D’ Angleterre’ appeared in Paris in 1631 prefixed to what appeared to be a French translation of Bacon’s natural history Sylva Sylvarum as Histoire Natvrelle De Mre Francois Bacon, Baron de Verulan, Viscomtede sainct Alban, & Chancelier d’Angleterre. The ‘Discovrs Svr La Vie De Mre Francois Bacon, Chancelier D’ Angleterre’ contains information not found in any other biography of Bacon some of it either provided by Bacon himself or somebody very close to him. #ElizabethI #VirginQueen #RobertDudley #FrancisBacon #RobertDevereux #PregnancyPortrait #HamptonCourt #RoyStrong #FrancisCarr Paper https://www.academia.edu/45006558/The_Pregnancy_Portrait_of_Queen_Elizabeth_I_and_The_Secret_Royal_Birth_of_Francis_Bacon_Concealed_Author_of_the_Shakespeare_Works Part 1 https://youtu.be/AFSxRYGxgjk Part 2 https://youtu.be/HWpuy13KHiA

York Place - Whitehall The York House mansion was set within grounds adjacent to those of the royal palace York Place (now known as the Palace of Whitehall comprising government buildings including the Cabinet Office and Ministry of Defence), Queen Elizabeth’s Palace, the main residence of English monarchs from the early sixteenth century. Interestingly Bacon refers to this change of name in his Shakespeare’s Act IV Scene I from Henry VIII: “You must no more call it York Place—that is past: For since the Cardinal fell that title's lost; 'Tis now the King's, and called Whitehall”. Dr Rawley who lived and spent several years with Bacon at York House when he was Lord Keeper and Lord Chancellor of England knew the difference between York House and York Place, the royal residence of Queen Elizabeth, and was privy to the secret of his royal birth. He had gone as close to the heels of the truth as he might dare by directly suggesting their was some kind of mystery regarding his birth by pointing to York Place, the royal palace of Queen Elizabeth, secret royal mother of Francis Bacon. #ElizabethI #VirginQueen #RobertDudley #FrancisBacon #RobertDevereux #PregnancyPortrait #HamptonCourt #RoyStrong #FrancisCarr Paper https://www.academia.edu/45006558/The_Pregnancy_Portrait_of_Queen_Elizabeth_I_and_The_Secret_Royal_Birth_of_Francis_Bacon_Concealed_Author_of_the_Shakespeare_Works Part 1 https://youtu.be/AFSxRYGxgjk Part 2 https://youtu.be/HWpuy13KHiA

York Place It will be observed that curiously Dr Rawley pointedly says that Bacon was born at York House or York Place, which are two separate buildings, and as he was perfectly aware carried absolutely different meanings and implications for the filial antecedents concerning the secret life of the man who had entrusted him with them. In Elizabethan England the mansion York House on the Strand was the official residence of the Lord Keeper of the Great Seal of England the office first held in the Elizabethan reign by Sir Nicholas Bacon who occupied it for some twenty years from 1559 until his death in 1579 and then the official residence of Francis as Lord Keeper and Lord Chancellor with whom Dr Rawley resided. #ElizabethI #VirginQueen #RobertDudley #FrancisBacon #RobertDevereux #PregnancyPortrait #HamptonCourt #RoyStrong #FrancisCarr Paper https://www.academia.edu/45006558/The_Pregnancy_Portrait_of_Queen_Elizabeth_I_and_The_Secret_Royal_Birth_of_Francis_Bacon_Concealed_Author_of_the_Shakespeare_Works Part 1 https://youtu.be/AFSxRYGxgjk Part 2 https://youtu.be/HWpuy13KHiA

Seeking explanation about Leicester's "mechanical dolphin" of 1575 Greenblatt's Will in the World describes elaborate festivities that the Earl of Leicester staged in 1575 for the visiting Queen Elizabeth I: In the single most extravagant entertainment Leicester staged for the queen during her long stay, a twenty-four-foot-long mechanical dolphin rose up out of the waters of the lake adjacent to the castle. On the back of the dolphin -- in whose belly was concealed a consort of wind instruments -- sat the figure of Arion, the legendary Greek musician, who sang, as Langham put it, "a delectable ditty" to the queen.... Wikipedia's account calls the dolphin a "float", but whether it floated or was borne in a parade like a modern "float", I can't tell. Of what was such a "mechanical dolphin" constructed? Could it really have borne musicians and wind instruments while immersed in a lake? What lifted it out of the lake? Dolphins have a very long history with our culture. 🙂 For fun, knowing ORION is 67 Simple cipher: https://internetshakespeare.uvic.ca/Library/facsimile/book/SLNSW_F1/273/index.html%3Fzoom=850.html

I'm going to try to post a quick explanation of Sonnet 34 as I read it from my unique perspective. Usually I like to talk about Sonnet 33, which I do often, but Sonnet 34 is also very important. We are living in Sonnet 34 at this very moment. Below is right now (as I start typing) on Monday, March 20, 2023. I'm in the US but am using the GMT time zone Pyramid: http://www.light-of-truth.com/pyramid-GMT.php#Sonnet034 One quick question to get out of the way, maybe aimed for Eric Roberts if he has time, is when did Line 474 of the Sonnets change from "losse" to "cross"? In 1609 it was "To him that beares the strong offenses losse", but modern version all have "To him that bears the strong offence’s cross". Of course what is curious to me is that March 21 is at the Spring Equinox when the Sun crosses the Equator. Right? Sun Crosses Celestial Equator The March equinox is the moment the Sun crosses the celestial equator—an imaginary line in the sky above Earth’s equator—from south to north. This happens on March 19, 20, or 21 every year. Just curious when, and who changed it. 🤔 "Rose" is the first word after "cross" four lines later; "Roses haue thornes,and siluer fountaines mud". But that's for another day's discussion. Right now, for me, Sonnet 34 is the reply to Sonnet 33. Below is not by any means a fact or popular opinion, it is my opinion based on many years of doing what I do with cipher messages that use to develop my opinions. Sonnet 33 is meant to be read as from Queen Elizabeth I, the "Virgin Queen", to her son who was known as Francis Bacon. Imagine that Shakespeare is Bacon who was the son of Queen Elizabeth. (There is substantial historical evidence to back up that idea). It is my deep opinion that Elizabeth actually wrote this sonnet to Bacon to be used in his Sonnets collection. Just my personal opinion... Here is Sonnet 33 in its original text as well: FVll many a glorious morning haue I seene, Flatter the mountaine tops with soueraine eie, Kissing with golden face the meddowes greene; Guilding pale streames with heauenly alcumy: Anon permit the basest cloudes to ride, With ougly rack on his celestiall face, And from the for-lorne world his visage hide Stealing vnseene to west with this disgrace: Euen so my Sunne one early morne did shine, With all triumphant splendor on my brow, But out alack,he was but one houre mine, The region cloude hath mask'd him from me now. Yet him for this,my loue no whit disdaineth, Suns of the world may staine,when heauens sun stainteh. So if we, for discussion anyway, accept these lines were written by an aging Queen to her son who was supposed to be a Prince and future King of England, Sonnet 34 is his reply to above. I'll try to connect a few things, but there is so much to explore! Oh my! Sonnet 34: VVHy didst thou promise such a beautious day, And make me trauaile forth without my cloake, To let bace cloudes ore-take me in my way, Hiding thy brau'ry in their rotten smoke. Tis not enough that through the cloude thou breake, To dry the raine on my storme-beaten face, For no man well of such a salue can speake, That heales the wound, and cures not the disgrace: Nor can thy shame giue phisicke to my griefe, Though thou repent , yet I haue still the losse, Th'offenders sorrow lends but weake reliefe To him that beares the strong offenses losse. Ah but those teares are pearle which thy loue sheeds, And they are ritch,and ransome all ill deeds. OK, I am also going to add another connection to Matthew 17:2 in the Bible. I'll grudgingly give credit to an Oxiefordun - Richard M. Waugaman, but it truly is a fantastic connection I was not aware of. I disagree with his De VVeird interpretation, but am thrilled about knowing this Key. 😉 https://www.originalbibles.com/geneva-bible-1569/ Chapter 17 verses 1 - 5: 1 And after sixe dayes, Iesus tooke Peter, and Iames and Iohn his brother, and brought them vp into an hie mountaine apart, 2 And was transfigured before them: and his face did shine as the Sunne, and his clothes were as white as the light. 3 And beholde, there appeared vnto them Moses, and Elias, talking with him. 4 Then answered Peter, and saide to Iesus, Master, it is good for vs to be here: if thou wilt, let vs make here three tabernacles, one for thee, and one for Moses, and one for Elias. 5 While he yet spake, behold, a bright cloude shadowed them: and beholde, there came a voyce out of the cloude, saying, This is that my beloued Sonne, in whom I am well pleased: heare him. Now the hard part, how to weave this together? It could be a book, but I'll just throw out a few lines and let them land as they will. Sonnet 33: Euen so my Sunne one early morne did shine, With all triumphant splendor on my brow, Mathew 17:2: 2 And was transfigured before them: and his face did shine as the Sunne, and his clothes were as white as the light. Sonnet 33 was to Bacon, born of the Virgin Queen. Mathew 17:2 was about Jesus, born to Virgin Mary. Sonnet 33: FVll many a glorious morning haue I seene, Flatter the mountaine tops with soueraine eie, Kissing with golden face the meddowes greene; Guilding pale streames with heauenly alcumy: Anon permit the basest cloudes to ride, With ougly rack on his celestiall face, Sonnet 34: VVHy didst thou promise such a beautious day, And make me trauaile forth without my cloake, To let bace cloudes ore-take me in my way, In Sonnet 33 Elizabeth is sharing how proud she was of her Princely son who she hoped would be king of England one day. He was kissing his golden face (the Sun) on the meadows green (England). But immediately (Anon) the political clouds required that her son would be hidden, cloaked. Sonnet 34 is Bacon asking why, or more likely how, she could give birth to the brightest genius maybe ever born and send him forth in life with his cloake which has double meaning. The first is the physical cloak that is worn by those with authority, and the other is the disguise, or cloak of secrecy. Is Bacon claiming that his "cloak" being Shakespeare is being denied by his mother, Elizabeth? She did send him away, and Bacon could not be the Prince he was born, nor the poet Shakespeare in public. She allowed the "bace cloudes" to over take his life! Pay attention to what Matthew 17:5 says clearly. I am still amazed! 5 While he yet spake, behold, a bright cloude shadowed them: and beholde, there came a voyce out of the cloude, saying, This is that my beloued Sonne, in whom I am well pleased: heare him. With Sonnets 33 and 34, it is a base cloud that masks Bacon who is the Sun, in Matthew 17 it is a bright cloud that shadowed Peter, James, and John and said, "This is that my beloued Sonne, in whom I am well pleased: heare him." Elizabeth was well read, and read bibles. I assume she had a Geneva bible. The KJV lines are the same or almost the same. If, as in my opinion, or as we pretend for discussion, Elizabeth knew the Sun and Cloud Bible story about Jesus, she would have had the intelligence to cloak her single one public acknowledgement about and to her true son in Sonnet 33. Ha! You say! A Bible connection to the Sonnets, a simple collection of silly poems by a guy who has no history, Willy Shakspur. Sonnet 35 carries the story forth: NO more bee greeu'd at that which thou hast done, Roses haue thornes,and siluer fountaines mud, Cloudes and eclipses staine both Moone and Sunne, And loathsome canker liues in sweetest bud. Clouds and eclipses stain both Moon and Sun? Listen closely now, Sonnet 33 ends at 11:59:59 PM on March 19, or Day 78 in the Sonnets Pyramid design: http://www.light-of-truth.com/pyramid-GMT.php#Sonnet033 In the year 33, about 14 days or so before Jesus was nailed to a cross possibly with a Lunar eclipse on Friday April 3, 0033, there was an eclipse on March 19, 0033. https://www.eclipsewise.com/solar/SEprime/0001-0100/SE0033Mar19Tprime.html The last line of Sonnet 33 which is also the last line of March 19 is: Suns of the world may staine, when heauens sun stainteh. That was also Elizabeth's final line to Bacon, maybe ever. Bacon nails it in Sonnet 35 as I already shared above. NO more bee greeu'd at that which thou hast done, Roses haue thornes, and siluer fountaines mud, Cloudes and eclipses staine both Moone and Sunne, And loathsome canker liues in sweetest bud. This is just a little bit one can bring forth from Sonnet 33-35, and into 36, and so on. Matthew 17 is most definitely connected. The transfiguring of Francis Bacon?

Thank you again Rob ❤️ I am touched and at the same time I think that it is too much praise . I am just a Bacon enthusiast as each of us, happy to bring my contribution . For me , there will always be only two Immortals ... The Great One and ... Connor Mc Leod !😊

The Immortal Allisnum2er, Yann! 🙂 As long as people talk about Shakespeare, your name will always be alive!

Hi A Phoenix, I don't know what to say, except my heartfelt thanks for your moving comment !🙏❤️

Many thanks Rob ! ❤️ I look forward to sharing with you the other parts of the series with their shares of surprises !😉 The 3rd part is in progress ! 😊

Hi Rob apologies for non-clarity. Hi Allisnum2er. One man's snake is another man's dragon. (That's a sηake-speare quote 😄 Genesis 3:14, So the LORD God said to the serpent, 'Because you have done this, cursed are you above all the livestock and all the wild animals! You will crawl on your belly and you will eat dust all the days of your life. From this passage one can only be left with the notion that the serpent was at first able to walk or fly. Genesis 3:15 I will put enmity between you and the woman, and between your offspring and her offspring; he shall bruise your head, and you shall bruise his heel.” In my opinion, this is what the original sonnets title artwork contains: a serpent biting the heel and being injured in return. Revelation 12:9 and 20:2 both describe Satan as a serpent. "He seized the dragon, that ancient serpent, who is the devil, or Satan, and bound him for a thousand years" (Revelation 20:2). "The great dragon was hurled down, that ancient serpent called the devil, or Satan, who leads the whole world astray. He was hurled to the earth, and his angels with him" (Revelation 12:9). Snakes with wings are a type of dragon known as an Amphiptere An Amphiptere; meaning bi-winged,is a type of winged serpent found in European heraldry. Amphiptere by Edward Topsell (1608). The History of Four-Footed Beasts and Serpents (Woodcuts), published in 1658. As for that "dolphin": the grotesque beast shown in the sonnets ornamental headpiece is constructed from vegetation, one can link the garden of Eden with these beasts, and also to the serpent-dragons and Genesis chapter 3. The sonnets beasts have legs by the way, also ears, and a tail which ends in a flower head. Dolphins have none of these. If they really were meant to be dolphins, what are those tongue-like things?

Love the Two Cupids riding Dolphins! Here are two of my favorites: And here is another one with two Dolphins:

Its hard to even say anything as you left me speechless! You definitely demonstrate the three 33s and page 33. Excellent! You always pierce the cloak and speak for Pallas Athena!

I am very happy to share with you the second part of my series "Bacon's Wit".😊 Bacon's Wit (Part 2).mp4

WOW ! First of all, great analysis Rob !❤️ Secondly, this is an incredible synchronicity ! Yesterday, I learned about the existence of the Statue of William Shakespeare in Stratford Town Hall. And I smiled discovering the text engraved on the scroll, a passage of page 159 of the First Folio that is the 177th page of the Book. I planned to share this with the B'Hive community in the 4th part of my series but I have no other choice than to share it with you today.😊 And I remind you that this is in this 177th page of the First Folio, that we can find the following passage ... https://internetshakespeare.uvic.ca/Library/facsimile/book/Bran_F1/177/index.html%3fzoom=1200.html 33 words, 33 = BACON MAB is, for me, the acronym of Marrow And Bones. And the the reference to the transfiguration is , in my view, a reference to one of the 153 emblems of Evangelicae Historiae Imagines (1593) https://sirbacon.org/bacon-forum/index.php?/topic/77-the-last-portrait/#comment-1859 The transfiguring of Francis Bacon ! 😉

I don't know who designed this before it was executed and put to paper. We are given only the name of the engraver. I don' t know who the likeness is supposed to represent. I don't think it's main function is to present a very good likeness. It appears to have been more important that the features be guided by the geometric composition that may have been handed to an engraver.as a starting point. What got produced is something rather stiff and cartoonish. Altrnatively you could suggest that the engraver did this on his own. The geometric feature with the most obvious intent is the positioning of the 80,60,40 triangle. It's center is also the center of the rectangle which contains the image. That tells you it was engineered to be that way. It is elegant enough that it was made to come out, but to have it be concentric means it was likely started with. That's about all I have to say about it. This we can show. The point of it is another story. The main composition is guided by a geometric idea for what Bacon and Brahe accepted as the cosmology of our solar system. It was an improvement over Ptolemy's system of epicenters, but it is still wrong. I doubt that Shakespeare would have had any opinion about that, but he could have. I don't know why anyone would have wanted to show that even if WS did hold that belief. It appears to me to be the idea of someone still living who has a hand in the production of the folio, and of someone who had an acute interest in the Summer triangle asterism. As you know, I feel we are well within our abilities to show that Bacon imagery was utilizing this triangular asterism as a celestial beacon in other places. I also think he used Triangulum. I feel we can show that someone was suggesting the use of this pairing. It's never more suggested than in Sylva Sylvarum, a work that was Bacon's Swan Song. What it all means is something I can only speculate about. If something is detectable and elegant, does it have a meaning? It must have had a meaning to someone.

🤞🤞🤞 I keep my fingers crossed for the Internet Archive lawsuit. I'm hoping the B'Hive to be ETERNAL !

I'm hoping the B'Hive will be immortal as well. 🙂 It may depend on how the Internet Archive lawsuit pans out. I know I'd be very sad to see the Wayback Machine and the online facsimile treasures go away forever!

There is certainly a good resemblence to that dolphin, at least in the face, bu what about those legs? Or am I seeing it all wrong?

If we are talking about gematria, it goes way back. 🙂 https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gematria History The first documented use of gematria is from an Assyrian inscription dating to the 8th century BCE, commissioned by Sargon II. In this inscription, Sargon II states: "the king built the wall of Khorsabad 16,283 cubits long to correspond with the numerical value of his name."[8]

I sure don't know, but dolphins in Bacon's time don't look much like real dolphins. This one is from 1579: https://gallica.bnf.fr/ark:/12148/btv1b8608301g/f246.item It is similar to the ones in the headpiece 1607: https://www.loc.gov/resource/rbctos.2017gen58402c2/?sp=33&r=0.213,0.102,0.409,0.329,0

Who established this method of approaching the text? Maybe Roger Bacon?

I just tried to access Internet archive ... 😢

Indeed, this would be a tragedy for researchers around the world. https://www.gizmodo.com.au/2023/03/internet-archive-faces-uphill-battle-in-lawsuit-over-its-free-digital-library/ https://blog.archive.org/2022/10/17/the-cdl-lawsuit-and-the-future-of-libraries/