Rick Wagner’s Video Episode II : Is Shakespeare Dead? Exposing the Shakespeare Conspiracy!
This is the SECOND episode of a 6-part TV series which delves into every aspect of the Shakespeare Authorship Issue.
Part 2 of this series exposes the fact that most of what people think they know about the author Shakespeare, is based on fraudulent evidence created by Stratfordian authorship conspirators.
Make Francis Bacon Great Again!
“Thank you very much, sirbacon.org, for your rigorous efforts to bring Lord Bacon’s truth to light. You’ve blessed me with ample amounts of information regarding his matter…” – Joshua Guillory (Read more)
Great Bacon Resource Available :
Christina G. Waldman has contributed a new essay, Bacon is Bellario with “Just Deserts for All”:
An explanation of Mark Edwin Andrews’ Second Argument in “Law v Equity” in “The Merchant of Venice’s Legalization of Act IV, Scene I “
William Shakespeare in “Peabody’s Improbable History” (from The Rocky & Bullwinkle Show)
Mr. Peabody, Shakespeare and Francis Bacon
Is Shakespeare Dead? Exposing the Shakespeare Conspiracy
This is the first episode of a 4-part TV series which delves into every aspect of the Shakespeare Authorship Issue.
Part 1 of this series exposes the fact that there there is no hard evidence to support the traditional claim that the man from Stratford was involved with the authorship of the plays and poems attributed to the name “William Shakespeare”.
Furthermore, the first episode presents compelling evidence that the man who is assumed to be the author of the Shakespearean works was illiterate and unschooled–and therefore, couldn’t possibly have been the Real Author.
Based on Richard Allan Wagner’s book:
“The Lost Secret of William Shakespeare”
We celebrate the birth of Sir Francis Bacon with an astonishing discovery regarding the famous Shakespeare title portrait that was a copper engraving, a peculiar image created by Martin Droeshout but not drawn from the Life. Ben Jonson warned us in the 1623 Shakespeare First Folio
To The Reader.
This Figure, that thou here seest put,
It was for gentle Shakespeare Cut,
Wherein the Graver had a Strife
with Nature, to out-doo the life:
O, could he but have drawne his wit
As well in brasse, as he hath hit
His face; the Print would then surpasse
All, that was ever writ in brasse.
But, since he cannot, Reader, looke
Not on his Picture, but his Booke.
Baconian researcher and lecturer, Simon Miles, reveals the embedded identity that was used behind the Picture and why.
(special Thanks to Rob Fowler for layout & design)
See :
The Prank of the Face : Unmasking the “Droeshout” Portrait of William Shakespeare
